If there are any inconsistencies with these recommendations, you're best off [creating an issue](https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/issues/new) against this document, or getting in touch with a QMK Collaborator on [Discord](https://discord.gg/Uq7gcHh).
- if submitter _does_ use their own `master` branch, they'll be given a link to the ["how to git"](newbs_git_using_your_master_branch.md) page after merging -- (end of this document will contain the contents of the message)
- the lowercase requirement may be relaxed if upstream sources originally had uppercase characters (e.g. LUFA, ChibiOS, or imported files from other repositories etc.)
- an example GPL2+ license header may be copied (and author modified) from the bottom of this document
- other licenses are permitted, however they must be GPL-compatible and must allow for redistribution. Using a different license will almost certainly delay a PR getting merged
- simple assignment-only `rules.mk` files should not need a license header - where additional logic is used in an `*.mk` file a license header may be appropriate
- no "old-school" or other low-level GPIO/I2C/SPI functions may be used -- must use QMK abstractions unless justifiable (and laziness is not valid justification)
- keyboard moves within the repository *must* go through the `develop` branch instead of `master`, so as to ensure compatibility for users
-`data/mappings/keyboard_aliases.hjson` must be updated to reflect the move, so users with pre-created configurator keymap.json files continue to detect the correct keyboard
- PR submissions from a `kbfirmware` export (or equivalent) will not be accepted unless converted to new QMK standards -- try `qmk import-kbfirmware` first
- With the move to [data driven](https://docs.qmk.fm/#/data_driven_config) keyboard configuration, we encourage contributors to utilise as many features as possible of the info.json [schema](https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/blob/master/data/schemas/keyboard.jsonschema).
- the mandatory elements for a minimally complete `info.json` at present are:
- valid URL
- valid maintainer
- valid USB VID/PID and device version
- displays correctly in Configurator (press Ctrl+Shift+I to preview local file, turn on fast input to verify ordering)
- If the keyboard only has a single electrical/switch layout:
- use `LAYOUT` as your macro name, unless a community layout already exists
- If the keyboard has multiple electrical/switch layouts:
- include a `LAYOUT_all` which specifies all possible layout positions in the electrical matrix
- use alternate layout names for all other possible layouts, preferring community layout names if an equivalent is available (e.g. `LAYOUT_tkl_ansi`, `LAYOUT_ortho_4x4` etc.)
- valid hardware availability link (unless handwired) -- private groupbuys are okay, but one-off prototypes will be questioned. If open-source, a link to files should be provided.
- if imgur is used, images should be resized appropriately: append "h" to the image url i.e. `https://i.imgur.com/vqgE7Ok.jpg` becomes `https://i.imgur.com/vqgE7Okh.jpg`
- no re-definitions of the default MCU parameters if same value, when compared to the equivalent MCU in [mcu_selection.mk](https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/blob/master/builddefs/mcu_selection.mk)
- don't repeat `MANUFACTURER` in the `PRODUCT` value
- no `#define DESCRIPTION`
- no Magic Key Options, MIDI Options or HD44780 configuration
- user preference configurable `#define`s need to be moved to keymap `config.h`
- "`DEBOUNCE`" instead of "`DEBOUNCING_DELAY`"
- bare minimum required code for a board to boot into QMK should be present
- initialisation code for the matrix and critical devices
- mirroring existing functionality of a commercial board (like custom keycodes and special animations etc.) should be handled through non-`default` keymaps
-`matrix_init_board()` etc. migrated to `keyboard_pre_init_kb()`, see: [keyboard_pre_init*](custom_quantum_functions.md?id=keyboard_pre_init_-function-documentation)
- prefer `CUSTOM_MATRIX = lite` if custom matrix used, allows for standard debounce, see [custom matrix 'lite'](custom_matrix.md?id=lite)
- prefer LED indicator [Configuration Options](feature_led_indicators.md?id=configuration-options) to custom `led_update_*()` implementations where possible
- Encoder support should not require any keyboard-level code, and associated keymaps should now leverage the [Encoder Map](feature_encoders.md?id=encoder-map) feature instead.
- if using `MO(_LOWER)` and `MO(_RAISE)` keycodes or equivalent, and the keymap has an adjust layer when holding both keys -- if the keymap has no "direct-to-adjust" keycode (such as `MO(_ADJUST)`) then you should prefer to write...
- submitters can have a personal (or bells-and-whistles) keymap showcasing capabilities in the same PR but it shouldn't be embedded in the 'default' keymap
- submitters can also have a "manufacturer-matching" keymap that mirrors existing functionality of the commercial product, if porting an existing board
- Do not include VIA json files in the PR. These do not belong in the QMK repository as they are not used by QMK firmware -- they belong in the [VIA Keyboard Repo](https://github.com/the-via/keyboards)
- For instance, only `wilba_tech` boards shall include `keyboards/wilba_tech/wt_main.c` and `keyboards/wilba_tech/wt_rgb_backlight.c`. But including `drivers/sensors/pmw3360.c` is absolutely fine for any and all boards.
- all core PRs must now target `develop` branch, which will subsequently be merged back to `master` on the breaking changes timeline
- as indicated above, the smallest set of changes to core components should be included in each PR
- PRs containing multiple areas of change will be asked to be split up and raised separately
- keyboard and keymap changes should only be included if they affect base keyboard builds, or the default-like `default`, `via`, `default_????` keymaps etc.
- keymap modifications for anything other than the default-like keymaps **should not be included in the initial PR** in order to simplify the review process
- the core PR submitter should submit a followup PR affecting other keymaps after initial PR merge
- large-scale refactoring or consolidation PRs that affect other keymaps (such as renaming keycodes) should always be raised separately
- for new MCUs, a new "child" keyboard should be added that targets your newly-added MCU, so that builds can be verified
- for new hardware support such as display panels, core-side matrix implementations, or other peripherals, an associated keymap should be provided
- if an existing keymap exists that can leverage this functionality this may not be required (e.g. a new RGB driver chip, supported by the `rgb` keymap) -- consult with the QMK Collaborators on Discord to determine if there is sufficient overlap already
- where relevant, unit tests are strongly recommended -- they boost the confidence level that changes behave correctly
- critical areas of the code -- such as the keycode handling pipeline -- will almost certainly require unit tests accompanying them to ensure current and future correctness
- you should not be surprised if a QMK collaborator requests unit tests to be included in your PR if it's critical functionality
For when people use their own `master` branch, post this after merge:
```
For future reference, we recommend against committing to your `master` branch as you've done here, because pull requests from modified `master` branches can make it more difficult to keep your QMK fork updated. It is highly recommended for QMK development – regardless of what is being done or where – to keep your master updated, but **NEVER** commit to it. Instead, do all your changes in a branch (branches are basically free in Git) and issue PRs from your branches when you're developing.
There are instructions on how to keep your fork updated here:
[**Best Practices: Your Fork's Master: Update Often, Commit Never**](https://docs.qmk.fm/#/newbs_git_using_your_master_branch)
[Fixing Your Branch](https://docs.qmk.fm/#/newbs_git_resynchronize_a_branch) will walk you through fixing up your `master` branch moving forward. If you need any help with this just ask.
In general, we want to see two (or more) approvals that are meaningful (e.g. that have inspected code) before a PR will be considered for merge. These reviews are not limited to collaborators -- any community member willing to put in the time is welcomed (and encouraged). The only difference is that your checkmark won't be green, and that's fine!
Additionally, PR reviews are something that is done in our free time. We are not paid nor compensated for the time we spend reviewing, as it is a labor of love. As such, this means that it can take time for us to get to your Pull Request. Things like family, or life can get in the way of us getting to PRs, and burnout is a serious concern. The QMK firmware repository averages 200 PRs opened and 200 PRs merged every month, so please have patience.