264 lines
10 KiB
Text
264 lines
10 KiB
Text
========= Binutils Maintainers =========
|
|
|
|
This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
|
|
of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
|
|
the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
|
|
programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
|
|
opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
|
|
GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
|
|
shared amoungst the projects.
|
|
|
|
The home page for binutils is:
|
|
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
|
|
|
|
and patches should be sent to:
|
|
|
|
binutils@sourceware.org
|
|
|
|
with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
|
|
top level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
|
|
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
|
|
|
and not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top level
|
|
configure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) should
|
|
be sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdb
|
|
lists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and
|
|
gdb-patches@sourceware.org).
|
|
|
|
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
|
|
|
|
The following people have permission to check patches into the
|
|
repository without obtaining approval first:
|
|
|
|
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
|
|
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
|
|
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
|
|
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
|
|
Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
|
|
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
|
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
|
Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org>
|
|
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
|
|
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
|
|
|
|
--------- Maintainers ---------
|
|
|
|
Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
|
|
permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
|
|
that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
|
|
the immediate domain that they maintain.
|
|
|
|
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
|
|
falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
|
|
maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
|
|
maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
|
|
responsibility among the other maintainers.
|
|
|
|
ALPHA Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
|
|
ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
|
ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
|
|
ARM Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
|
|
ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
|
|
AVR Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
|
|
AVR Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@amelek.gda.pl>
|
|
BFIN Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
|
|
BFIN Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>
|
|
BFIN Mike Frysinger <michael.frysinger@analog.com>
|
|
BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
|
|
CR16 M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
|
|
CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
|
|
CRX M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
|
|
DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias <nkavv@physics.auth.gr>
|
|
DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
|
|
FR30 Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
|
FRV Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
|
FRV Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
|
H8300 Prafulla Thakare <prafulla.thakare@kpitcummins.com>
|
|
HPPA Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>
|
|
HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
|
HPPA elf64 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> [Basic maintainance only]
|
|
IA-64 Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
|
|
IQ2000 Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>
|
|
i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@rice.edu>
|
|
ix86 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
|
|
ix86 PE Christopher Faylor <me+binutils@cgf.cx>
|
|
ix86 COFF DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
|
ix86 PE/COFF Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
|
|
ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
|
|
LM32 Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
|
|
M32R Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
|
|
M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <stcarrez@nerim.fr>
|
|
M88k Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
|
|
MACH-O Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
|
MAXQ Inderpreet Singh <inderpreetb@noida.hcltech.com>
|
|
MEP Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
|
MICROBLAZE Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
|
|
MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
|
|
MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
|
|
MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
|
|
MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
|
Moxie Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
|
|
MSP430 Dmitry Diky <diwil@spec.ru>
|
|
NetBSD support Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
|
|
PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
|
|
PPC Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
|
PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
|
|
RX DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
|
RX Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
|
s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
SCORE Mei Ligang <ligang@sunnorth.com.cn>
|
|
SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
|
SH Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
|
|
SPARC Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
|
|
SPU Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
|
TIC4X Svein Seldal <svein@dev.seldal.com>
|
|
TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>
|
|
TIC6X Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
|
|
VAX Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
|
|
VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
|
|
VMS Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
|
x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
|
|
x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
|
|
x86_64 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
|
|
XCOFF Richard Sandiford <r.sandiford@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
Xtensa Sterling Augustine <augustine.sterling@gmail.com>
|
|
z80 Arnold Metselaar <arnold.metselaar@planet.nl>
|
|
z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
|
|
|
|
CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
|
|
disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
|
|
It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
|
|
is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
|
|
CGEN and the files that it creates.
|
|
|
|
If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
|
|
|
|
cgen@sourceware.org
|
|
|
|
The current CGEN maintainers are:
|
|
|
|
Doug Evans, Frank Eigler
|
|
|
|
--------- Write After Approval ---------
|
|
|
|
Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
|
|
changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
|
|
one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
|
|
|
|
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
|
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
|
|
remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
|
|
|
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
|
|
|
|
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
|
|
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
|
|
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
|
|
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
|
|
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
|
|
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
|
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
|
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
|
|
|
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
|
|
|
|
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
|
|
also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
|
|
only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
|
|
ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
|
|
burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
|
|
great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
|
|
the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
|
|
|
|
Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
|
|
|
-------- Testsuites ---------------
|
|
|
|
In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should be
|
|
considered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list for
|
|
approval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility the
|
|
relevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.
|
|
Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-priveleges
|
|
person.
|
|
|
|
-------- Configure patches ----------
|
|
|
|
Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)
|
|
are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approved
|
|
by the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the config
|
|
maintainer at:
|
|
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
|
|
|
--------- Creating Branches ---------
|
|
|
|
Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branch
|
|
to use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSF
|
|
policies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from people
|
|
with appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legal
|
|
requirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equally
|
|
to contributions on a branch.
|
|
|
|
Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch of
|
|
the form:
|
|
|
|
binutils-<org>-<name>
|
|
|
|
where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initials
|
|
if you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch created
|
|
by The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for
|
|
"org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choice
|
|
for "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so
|
|
"name" may contain additional hyphens.
|
|
|
|
Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop a
|
|
port of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriate
|
|
choice of branch name would be:
|
|
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm
|
|
|
|
A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some
|
|
organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you
|
|
should follow these rules:
|
|
|
|
1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.
|
|
|
|
2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm_20050101
|
|
|
|
would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. Check out binutils, so that you have a CVS checkout corresponding
|
|
to the initial state of your branch.
|
|
|
|
2. Create a tag:
|
|
|
|
cvs tag binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint
|
|
|
|
That tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what's
|
|
changed on the branch relative to the initial state.
|
|
|
|
3. Create the branch:
|
|
|
|
cvs rtag -b -r binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint \
|
|
binutils-<org>-<name>-branch
|
|
|
|
4. Document the branch:
|
|
|
|
Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and check
|
|
that file in. All branch descriptions should be added to the
|
|
HEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modify
|
|
binutils/BRANCHES on a branch!
|
|
|
|
Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not create
|
|
without the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
|