old-cross-binutils/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-sc.exp
Joel Brobecker 4c38e0a4fc Update copyright year in most headers.
Automatic update by copyright.sh.
2010-01-01 07:32:07 +00:00

500 lines
16 KiB
Text

# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
# Copyright 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test "return", "finish", and "call" of functions that a scalar (int,
# float, enum) and/or take a single scalar parameter.
if $tracelevel then {
strace $tracelevel
}
set prms_id 0
set bug_id 0
# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
# test.
if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
fail "This target can not call functions"
continue
}
set testfile "call-sc"
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
# Create and source the file that provides information about the
# compiler used to compile the test case.
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
return -1;
}
# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
global testfile
if [string match $file $testfile] {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
}
}
proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
global testfile
if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
}
}
# Compile a variant of scalars.c using TYPE to specify the type of the
# parameter and return-type. Run the compiled program up to "main".
# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
proc start_scalars_test { type } {
global testfile
global srcfile
global binfile
global objdir
global subdir
global srcdir
global gdb_prompt
global expect_out
# Create the additional flags
set flags "debug additional_flags=-DT=${type}"
set testfile "call-sc-${type}"
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
# built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
untested call-sc.exp
return -1
}
}
# Start with a fresh gdb.
gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
# Make certain that the output is consistent
gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
"set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
"set print address off; ${testfile}"
gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
"set width 0; ${testfile}"
# Advance to main
if { ![runto_main] } then {
gdb_suppress_tests;
}
# Get the debug format
get_debug_format
# check that type matches what was passed in
set test "ptype; ${testfile}"
set foo_t "xxx"
gdb_test_multiple "ptype ${type}" "${test}" {
-re "type = (\[^\r\n\]*)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set foo_t "$expect_out(1,string)"
pass "$test (${foo_t})"
}
}
gdb_test "ptype foo" "type = ${foo_t}" "ptype foo; ${testfile} $expect_out(1,string)"
}
# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
proc i2a { n } {
return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
}
proc I2A { n } {
return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
}
# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
global testfile
if [string match $file $testfile] {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
}
}
proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
global testfile
if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
}
}
# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
# returning (or passing) in a single scalar.
# start_scalars_test() will have previously built a program with a
# specified scalar type. To ensure robustness of the output, "p/c" is
# used.
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
proc test_scalar_calls { } {
global testfile
global gdb_prompt
# Check that GDB can always extract a scalar-return value from an
# inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of
# an inferior function call's return value these should never fail
# Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun" and then
# examining the return value printed by GDB.
set tests "call ${testfile}"
# Call fun, checking the printed return-value.
gdb_test "p/c fun()" "= 49 '1'" "p/c fun(); ${tests}"
# Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
# This test can never fail.
# Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun" which
# stores its parameter in the global variable "L". GDB then
# examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
gdb_test "call Fun(foo)" "" "call Fun(foo); ${tests}"
gdb_test "p/c L" " = 49 '1'" "p/c L; ${tests}"
}
# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
# return-value.
# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
# function and display the final source and line information.
# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
# this test.
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
# other.
proc test_scalar_returns { } {
global gdb_prompt
global testfile
set tests "return ${testfile}"
# Check that "return" works.
# GDB must always force the return of a function that has
# a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
# possible to store the return value in a register.
# The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
# "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
# snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
# is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
# compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
# the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
# consistency between this and the "finish" case.
# Get into a call of fun
gdb_test "advance fun" \
"fun .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo.*" \
"advance to fun for return; ${tests}"
# Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
gdb_test "p/c L" " = 90 'Z'" "zed L for return; ${tests}"
# Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
# performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
# GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
# known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
# the frame ("No frame").
# The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
# entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
# "return_value_unknown", if non-empty, records why GDB realised
# that it didn't know where the return value was.
set test "return foo; ${tests}"
set return_value_unknown 0
set return_value_unimplemented 0
gdb_test_multiple "return foo" "${test}" {
-re "The location" {
# Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
set return_value_unknown 1
exp_continue
}
-re "A structure or union" {
# Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
set return_value_unknown 1
# Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
# hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
set return_value_unimplemented 1
exp_continue
}
-re "Make fun return now.*y or n. $" {
gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
-re "L *= fun.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# Need to step off the function call
gdb_test "next" "zed.*" "${test}"
}
-re "zed \\(\\);.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "${test}"
}
}
}
}
# If the previous test did not work, the program counter might
# still be inside foo() rather than main(). Make sure the program
# counter is is main().
#
# This happens on ppc64 GNU/Linux with gcc 3.4.1 and a buggy GDB
set test "return foo; synchronize pc to main()"
for {set loop_count 0} {$loop_count < 2} {incr loop_count} {
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace 1" $test {
-re "#0.*main \\(\\).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
pass $test
set loop_count 2
}
-re "#0.*fun \\(\\).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if {$loop_count < 1} {
gdb_test "finish" ".*" ""
} else {
fail $test
set loop_count 2
}
}
}
}
# Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
# just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
# "return_value_unknown" set above.
set test "value foo returned; ${tests}"
gdb_test_multiple "p/c L" "${test}" {
-re " = 49 '1'.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $return_value_unknown {
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
# know the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
} else {
pass "${test}"
}
}
-re " = 90 .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $return_value_unknown {
# The struct return case. Since any modification
# would be by reference, and that can't happen, the
# value should be unmodified and hence Z is expected.
# Is this a reasonable assumption?
pass "${test}"
} else {
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
# the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
}
}
-re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $return_value_unimplemented {
# What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
# return_value, and hence has to fail.
kfail "$test" gdb/1444
} else {
fail "$test"
}
}
}
# Check that a "finish" works.
# This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
# Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
# The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
# advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
# finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
# "p/c", is checked.
# Get into "fun()".
gdb_test "advance fun" \
"fun .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo.*" \
"advance to fun for finish; ${tests}"
# Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
gdb_test "p/c L" " = 90 'Z'" "zed L for finish; ${tests}"
# Finish the function, set 'finish_value_unknown" to non-empty if the
# return-value was not found.
set test "finish foo; ${tests}"
set finish_value_unknown 0
gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
-re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
pass "${test}"
}
-re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
set finish_value_unknown 1
pass "${test}"
}
}
# Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
# "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
# check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
set test "value foo finished; ${tests}"
gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
-re " = 49 '1'\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $finish_value_unknown {
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
# know the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
} else {
pass "${test}"
}
}
-re " = 90 'Z'\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
# The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
if $finish_value_unknown {
pass "${test}"
} else {
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
# know the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
}
}
}
# Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
# behavior.
# Since both "return" and "finish" use equivalent "which
# return-value convention" logic, both commands should have
# identical can/can-not find return-value messages.
# Note that since "call" and "finish" use common code paths, a
# failure here is a strong indicator of problems with "store
# return-value" code paths. Suggest looking at "return_value"
# when investigating a fix.
set test "return and finish use same convention; ${tests}"
if {$finish_value_unknown == $return_value_unknown} {
pass "${test}"
} else {
kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
}
}
# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
# possible sized char scalars in that range. But only a restricted
# range of the other types.
# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized scalars in memory.
# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte scalars go in memory. 2 or more char
# scalars go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
# original "scalars" test was doing.
start_scalars_test tc
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Let the fun begin.
# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
# returns" test up to that boundary.
# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
# tl=8.
# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
start_scalars_test ts
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_scalars_test ti
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_scalars_test tl
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
start_scalars_test tll
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_scalars_test tf
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
start_scalars_test td
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
start_scalars_test tld
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_scalars_test te
test_scalar_calls
test_scalar_returns
return 0