No description
776f04fafe
I noticed something odd while doing "stepi" over a fork syscall: ... (gdb) set disassemble-next-line on ... (gdb) si 0x000000323d4ba7c2 131 pid = ARCH_FORK (); 0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8 0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx 0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10 0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi 0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi 0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax => 0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax 0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475> (gdb) si 0x000000323d4ba7c4 131 pid = ARCH_FORK (); 0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8 0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx 0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10 0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi 0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi 0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax 0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall => 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax 0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475> (gdb) si 0x000000323d4ba7c4 131 pid = ARCH_FORK (); 0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8 0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx 0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10 0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi 0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi 0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax 0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall => 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax 0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475> (gdb) si 0x000000323d4ba7ca 131 pid = ARCH_FORK (); 0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8 0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx 0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10 0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi 0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi 0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax 0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax => 0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475> Notice how the third "si" didn't actually make progress. Turning on infrun and lin-lwp debug, we see: (gdb) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (process 5252) infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=144, step=1) infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [process 5252] at 0x323d4ba7c4 LLR: Preparing to step process 5252, 0, inferior_ptid process 5252 RC: Not resuming sibling process 5252 (not stopped) LLR: PTRACE_SINGLESTEP process 5252, 0 (resume event thread) sigchld infrun: wait_for_inferior () linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [] LLW: enter LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 5252, No child processes LLW: waitpid 5252 received Child exited (stopped) LLW: Candidate event Child exited (stopped) in process 5252. SEL: Select single-step process 5252 LLW: exit infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 5252 [process 5252], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGCHLD infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x323d4ba7c4 infrun: random signal 20 infrun: stepi/nexti infrun: stop_stepping So the inferior got a SIGCHLD (because the fork child exited while we're doing 'si'), and since that signal is set to "nostop noprint pass" (by default), it's considered a random signal, so it should not cause a stop. But, it resulted in an immediate a stop_stepping call anyway. So the single-step never really finished. This is a regression caused by: [[PATCH] Do not respawn signals, take 2.] https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00702.html Specifically, caused by this change (as mentioned in the "the lost step issue first" part of that mail): diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 53db335..3e8dbc8 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -4363,10 +4363,8 @@ process_event_stop_test: (leaving the inferior at the step-resume-breakpoint without actually executing it). Either way continue until the breakpoint is really hit. */ - keep_going (ecs); - return; } - + else /* Handle cases caused by hitting a breakpoint. */ { That made GDB fall through to the > /* In all-stop mode, if we're currently stepping but have stopped in > some other thread, we need to switch back to the stepped thread. */ > if (!non_stop) part. However, if we don't have a stepped thread to get back to, we'll now also fall through to all the "stepping" tests. For line stepping, that'll turn out okay, as we'll just end up realizing the thread is still in the stepping range, and needs to be re-stepped. However, for stepi/nexti, we'll reach: if (ecs->event_thread->control.step_range_end == 1) { /* It is stepi or nexti. We always want to stop stepping after one instruction. */ if (debug_infrun) fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: stepi/nexti\n"); ecs->event_thread->control.stop_step = 1; print_end_stepping_range_reason (); stop_stepping (ecs); return; } and stop, even though the thread actually made no progress. The fix is to restore the keep_going call, but put it after the "switch back to the stepped thread" code, and before the stepping tests. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17, native and gdbserver. New test included. gdb/ 2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/16062 * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Keep going if we got a random signal we should not stop for, instead of falling through to the step tests. gdb/testsuite/ 2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/16062 * gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.c: New file. * gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.exp: New file. |
||
---|---|---|
bfd | ||
binutils | ||
config | ||
cpu | ||
elfcpp | ||
etc | ||
gas | ||
gdb | ||
gold | ||
gprof | ||
include | ||
intl | ||
ld | ||
libdecnumber | ||
libiberty | ||
opcodes | ||
readline | ||
sim | ||
texinfo | ||
.cvsignore | ||
.gitignore | ||
ChangeLog | ||
compile | ||
config-ml.in | ||
config.guess | ||
config.rpath | ||
config.sub | ||
configure | ||
configure.ac | ||
COPYING | ||
COPYING.LIB | ||
COPYING.LIBGLOSS | ||
COPYING.NEWLIB | ||
COPYING3 | ||
COPYING3.LIB | ||
depcomp | ||
djunpack.bat | ||
install-sh | ||
libtool.m4 | ||
ltgcc.m4 | ||
ltmain.sh | ||
ltoptions.m4 | ||
ltsugar.m4 | ||
ltversion.m4 | ||
lt~obsolete.m4 | ||
MAINTAINERS | ||
Makefile.def | ||
Makefile.in | ||
Makefile.tpl | ||
makefile.vms | ||
missing | ||
mkdep | ||
mkinstalldirs | ||
move-if-change | ||
README | ||
README-maintainer-mode | ||
setup.com | ||
src-release | ||
symlink-tree | ||
ylwrap |
README for GNU development tools This directory contains various GNU compilers, assemblers, linkers, debuggers, etc., plus their support routines, definitions, and documentation. If you are receiving this as part of a GDB release, see the file gdb/README. If with a binutils release, see binutils/README; if with a libg++ release, see libg++/README, etc. That'll give you info about this package -- supported targets, how to use it, how to report bugs, etc. It is now possible to automatically configure and build a variety of tools with one command. To build all of the tools contained herein, run the ``configure'' script here, e.g.: ./configure make To install them (by default in /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/lib, etc), then do: make install (If the configure script can't determine your type of computer, give it the name as an argument, for instance ``./configure sun4''. You can use the script ``config.sub'' to test whether a name is recognized; if it is, config.sub translates it to a triplet specifying CPU, vendor, and OS.) If you have more than one compiler on your system, it is often best to explicitly set CC in the environment before running configure, and to also set CC when running make. For example (assuming sh/bash/ksh): CC=gcc ./configure make A similar example using csh: setenv CC gcc ./configure make Much of the code and documentation enclosed is copyright by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. See the file COPYING or COPYING.LIB in the various directories, for a description of the GNU General Public License terms under which you can copy the files. REPORTING BUGS: Again, see gdb/README, binutils/README, etc., for info on where and how to report problems.