The "record function-call-history" and "record instruction-history" commands
accept a range "begin, end". End is not included in both cases. Include it.
2014-01-16 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* record-btrace.c (record_btrace_insn_history_range): Include
end.
(record_btrace_insn_history_from): Adjust range.
(record_btrace_call_history_range): Include
end.
(record_btrace_call_history_from): Adjust range.
* NEWS: Announce changes.
testsuite/
* gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: Update tests.
* gdb.btrace/instruction_history.exp: Update tests.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Process Record and Replay): Update documentation.
Add a new modifier /c to the "record function-call-history" command to
indent the function name based on its depth in the call stack.
Also reorder the optional fields to have the indentation at the very beginning.
Prefix the insn range (/i modifier) with "inst ".
Prefix the source line (/l modifier) with "at ".
Change the range syntax from "begin-end" to "begin,end" to allow copy&paste to
the "record instruction-history" and "list" commands.
Adjust the respective tests and add new tests for the /c modifier.
2014-01-16 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* record.h (enum record_print_flag)
<record_print_indent_calls>: New.
* record.c (get_call_history_modifiers): Recognize /c modifier.
(_initialize_record): Document /c modifier.
* record-btrace.c (btrace_call_history): Add btinfo parameter.
Reorder fields. Optionally indent the function name. Update
all users.
* NEWS: Announce changes.
testsuite/
* gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: Fix expected field
order for "record function-call-history".
Add new tests for "record function-call-history /c".
* gdb.btrace/exception.cc: New.
* gdb.btrace/exception.exp: New.
* gdb.btrace/tailcall.exp: New.
* gdb.btrace/x86-tailcall.S: New.
* gdb.btrace/x86-tailcall.c: New.
* gdb.btrace/unknown_functions.c: New.
* gdb.btrace/unknown_functions.exp: New.
* gdb.btrace/Makefile.in (EXECUTABLES): Add new.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Process Record and Replay): Document new /c
modifier accepted by "record function-call-history".
Add /i modifier to "record function-call-history" example.
The record instruction-history and record-function-call-history commands start
counting instructions at zero. This is somewhat unintuitive when we start
navigating in the recorded instruction history. Start at one, instead.
2014-01-16 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* btrace.c (ftrace_new_function): Start counting at one.
* record-btrace.c (record_btrace_info): Adjust number of calls
and insns.
* NEWS: Announce it.
testsuite/
* gdb.btrace/instruction_history.exp: Update.
* gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: Update.
With the "/i" modifier, we print the instruction number range in the
"record function-call-history" command as [begin, end).
It would be more intuitive if we printed the range as [begin, end].
2014-01-16 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* record-btrace.c (btrace_call_history_insn_range): Print
insn range as [begin, end].
The branch trace is represented as 3 vectors:
- a block vector
- a instruction vector
- a function vector
Each vector (except for the first) is computed from the one above.
Change this into a graph where a node represents a sequence of instructions
belonging to the same function and where we have three types of edges to connect
the function segments:
- control flow
- same function (instance)
- call stack
This allows us to navigate in the branch trace. We will need this for "record
goto" and reverse execution.
This patch introduces the data structure and computes the control flow edges.
It also introduces iterator structs to simplify iterating over the branch trace
in control-flow order.
It also fixes PR gdb/15240 since now recursive calls are handled correctly.
Fix the test that got the number of expected fib instances and also the
function numbers wrong.
The current instruction had been part of the branch trace. This will look odd
once we start support for reverse execution. Remove it. We still keep it in
the trace itself to allow extending the branch trace more easily in the future.
2014-01-16 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* btrace.h (struct btrace_func_link): New.
(enum btrace_function_flag): New.
(struct btrace_inst): Rename to ...
(struct btrace_insn): ...this. Update all users.
(struct btrace_func) <ibegin, iend>: Remove.
(struct btrace_func_link): New.
(struct btrace_func): Rename to ...
(struct btrace_function): ...this. Update all users.
(struct btrace_function) <segment, flow, up, insn, insn_offset)
(number, level, flags>: New.
(struct btrace_insn_iterator): Rename to ...
(struct btrace_insn_history): ...this.
Update all users.
(struct btrace_insn_iterator, btrace_call_iterator): New.
(struct btrace_target_info) <btrace, itrace, ftrace>: Remove.
(struct btrace_target_info) <begin, end, level>
<insn_history, call_history>: New.
(btrace_insn_get, btrace_insn_number, btrace_insn_begin)
(btrace_insn_end, btrace_insn_prev, btrace_insn_next)
(btrace_insn_cmp, btrace_find_insn_by_number, btrace_call_get)
(btrace_call_number, btrace_call_begin, btrace_call_end)
(btrace_call_prev, btrace_call_next, btrace_call_cmp)
(btrace_find_function_by_number, btrace_set_insn_history)
(btrace_set_call_history): New.
* btrace.c (btrace_init_insn_iterator)
(btrace_init_func_iterator, compute_itrace): Remove.
(ftrace_print_function_name, ftrace_print_filename)
(ftrace_skip_file): Change
parameter to const.
(ftrace_init_func): Remove.
(ftrace_debug): Use new btrace_function fields.
(ftrace_function_switched): Also consider gaining and
losing symbol information).
(ftrace_print_insn_addr, ftrace_new_call, ftrace_new_return)
(ftrace_new_switch, ftrace_find_caller, ftrace_new_function)
(ftrace_update_caller, ftrace_fixup_caller, ftrace_new_tailcall):
New.
(ftrace_new_function): Move. Remove debug print.
(ftrace_update_lines, ftrace_update_insns): New.
(ftrace_update_function): Check for call, ret, and jump.
(compute_ftrace): Renamed to ...
(btrace_compute_ftrace): ...this. Rewritten to compute call
stack.
(btrace_fetch, btrace_clear): Updated.
(btrace_insn_get, btrace_insn_number, btrace_insn_begin)
(btrace_insn_end, btrace_insn_prev, btrace_insn_next)
(btrace_insn_cmp, btrace_find_insn_by_number, btrace_call_get)
(btrace_call_number, btrace_call_begin, btrace_call_end)
(btrace_call_prev, btrace_call_next, btrace_call_cmp)
(btrace_find_function_by_number, btrace_set_insn_history)
(btrace_set_call_history): New.
* record-btrace.c (require_btrace): Use new btrace thread
info fields.
(record_btrace_info, btrace_insn_history)
(record_btrace_insn_history, record_btrace_insn_history_range):
Use new btrace thread info fields and new iterator.
(btrace_func_history_src_line): Rename to ...
(btrace_call_history_src_line): ...this. Use new btrace
thread info fields.
(btrace_func_history): Rename to ...
(btrace_call_history): ...this. Use new btrace thread info
fields and new iterator.
(record_btrace_call_history, record_btrace_call_history_range):
Use new btrace thread info fields and new iterator.
testsuite/
* gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: Fix expected function
trace.
* gdb.btrace/instruction_history.exp: Initialize traced.
Remove traced_functions.
RECORD_IS_USED and record_full_open look at current_target.to_stratum
to determine whether a record target is in use. This is wrong because
arch_stratum is greater than record_stratum, so if an arch_stratum
target is pushed, RECORD_IS_USED and record_full_open will miss it.
To fix this, we can use the existing find_record_target instead, which
looks up for a record stratum target across the target stack. Since
that means exporting find_record_target in record.h, RECORD_IS_USED
ends up redundant, so the patch eliminates it.
That exercise then reveals other issues:
- adjust_pc_after_break is gating record_full_... calls based on
RECORD_IS_USED. But, record_full_ calls shouldn't be made when
recording with the record-btrace target. So this adds a new
record_full_is_used predicate to be used in that spot.
- record_full_open says "Process record target already running", even
if the recording target is record-btrace ("process record" is the
original complete name of the record-full target). record_btrace_open
only says "The process is already being recorded." and does not
suggest "record stop", like record-full does. The patch factors out
and merges that error to a new record_preopen function that all record
targets call in their open routine.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17.
gdb/
2014-01-14 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (use_displaced_stepping): Use find_record_target
instead of RECORD_IS_USED.
(adjust_pc_after_break): Use record_full_is_used instead of
RECORD_IS_USED.
* record-btrace.c (record_btrace_open): Call record_preopen
instead of checking RECORD_IS_USED.
* record-full.c (record_full_shortname)
(record_full_core_shortname): New globals.
(record_full_is_used): New function.
(find_full_open): Call record_preopen instead of checking
RECORD_IS_USED.
(init_record_full_ops): Set the target's shortname to
record_full_shortname.
(init_record_full_core_ops): Set the target's shortname to
record_full_core_shortname.
* record-full.h (record_full_is_used): Declare.
* record.c (find_record_target): Make extern.
(record_preopen): New function.
* record.h (RECORD_IS_USED): Delete macro.
(find_record_target, record_preopen): Declare functions.
Reading symbols from /bin/true...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) b _start
Function "_start" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (_start) pending.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /bin/true
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000039a0400af0 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(gdb) rec b
(gdb) r
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y
Starting program: /bin/true
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000039a0400af0 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(gdb) rec b
gdb/record-btrace.c:154: internal-error: record_btrace_open:
Assertion `record_btrace_thread_observer == NULL' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
gdb/
* record-btrace.c (record_btrace_close): Call
record_btrace_auto_disable.
testsuite/
* gdb.btrace/enable.exp: Add regression test.
The target implements the new record sub-commands
"record instruction-history" and
"record function-call-history".
The target does not support reverse execution or navigation in the
recorded execution log.
gdb/
* Makefile.in (SFILES): Add record-btrace.c
(COMMON_OBS): Add record-btrace.o
* record-btrace.c: New.
* objfiles.c: Include btrace.h.
(free_objfile): call btrace_free_objfile.
