darkkirb/old-cross-binutils
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Remove comments on software_single_step in gdbarch.sh

Browse source 
This comment is out of date.  We've already done that.  Patch is to remove
it.

gdb:

2016-03-23  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
	* gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
This commit is contained in:
Yao Qi 2016-03-23 11:21:20 +00:00
parent a140626a94
commit cc651c1cdd
3 changed files with 5 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2016-03-23 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
2016-03-21 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* arm-tdep.c (arm_record_media): New.

4
gdb/gdbarch.h
View file

@ -646,10 +646,6 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_addr_
indicates if the target needs software single step. An ISA method to
implement it.
FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
(as with rs6000).
FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards. It should be asking if the
target can single step. If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.

4
gdb/gdbarch.sh
View file

@ -605,10 +605,6 @@ m:CORE_ADDR:addr_bits_remove:CORE_ADDR addr:addr::core_addr_identity::0
# indicates if the target needs software single step. An ISA method to
# implement it.
#
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
# breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
# (as with rs6000).
#
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards. It should be asking if the
# target can single step. If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
#