linux-record: Fix bad fall-through for pipe/pipe2
This patch added handling for some syscalls to linux-record.c: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-10/msg00452.html But for both `pipe' and `pipe2' the patch lacks a statement after an `if', such that the following `break' is interpreted as the `if'-body instead. This adds the missing (return-) statements for the conditionals. gdb/ChangeLog: * linux-record.c (record_linux_system_call): Add missing return statements to handling of pipe and pipe2 syscalls.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3f8e58e93
commit
afdab91654
2 changed files with 7 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2016-03-17 Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* linux-record.c (record_linux_system_call): Add missing return
|
||||
statements to handling of pipe and pipe2 syscalls.
|
||||
|
||||
2016-03-16 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* xml-tdesc.c (tdesc_start_enum): Fix c++ build.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (enum gdb_syscall syscall,
|
|||
regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, tdep->arg1, &tmpulongest);
|
||||
if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
|
||||
tdep->size_int * 2))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case gdb_sys_times:
|
||||
|
@ -2312,6 +2313,7 @@ Do you want to stop the program?"),
|
|||
regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, tdep->arg1, &tmpulongest);
|
||||
if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
|
||||
tdep->size_int * 2))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case gdb_sys_inotify_init1:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue