2002-04-05 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>

* breakpoint.c (clear_command): Rewrite middle section to
	combine two loops with identical control conditions.
	Add a cleanup to eliminate a memory leak.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Snyder 2002-04-09 22:33:25 +00:00
parent 96cb11df6d
commit 80f8a6eba5
2 changed files with 74 additions and 78 deletions

View file

@ -200,6 +200,9 @@
2002-04-05 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
* breakpoint.c (clear_command): Rewrite middle section to
combine two loops with identical control conditions.
Add a cleanup to eliminate a memory leak.
* cli/cli-dump.c (restore_section_callback): Use paddr_nz.
2002-04-05 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)

View file

@ -6442,15 +6442,15 @@ tcatch_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
catch_command_1 (arg, 1, from_tty);
}
/* Delete breakpoints by address or line. */
static void
clear_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
{
register struct breakpoint *b, *b1;
struct breakpoint *b, *tmp, *prev, *found;
int default_match;
struct symtabs_and_lines sals;
struct symtab_and_line sal;
register struct breakpoint *found;
int i;
if (arg)
@ -6462,6 +6462,7 @@ clear_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
{
sals.sals = (struct symtab_and_line *)
xmalloc (sizeof (struct symtab_and_line));
make_cleanup (xfree, sals.sals);
INIT_SAL (&sal); /* initialize to zeroes */
sal.line = default_breakpoint_line;
sal.symtab = default_breakpoint_symtab;
@ -6476,13 +6477,11 @@ clear_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
}
/* For each line spec given, delete bps which correspond
to it. We do this in two loops: the first loop looks at
the initial bp(s) in the chain which should be deleted,
the second goes down the rest of the chain looking ahead
one so it can take those bps off the chain without messing
up the chain. */
to it. Do it in two passes, solely to preserve the current
behavior that from_tty is forced true if we delete more than
one breakpoint. */
found = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < sals.nelts; i++)
{
/* If exact pc given, clear bpts at that pc.
@ -6498,81 +6497,75 @@ clear_command (char *arg, int from_tty)
1 0 <can't happen> */
sal = sals.sals[i];
found = (struct breakpoint *) 0;
while (breakpoint_chain
/* Why don't we check here that this is not
a watchpoint, etc., as we do below?
I can't make it fail, but don't know
what's stopping the failure: a watchpoint
of the same address as "sal.pc" should
wind up being deleted. */
&& (((sal.pc && (breakpoint_chain->address == sal.pc))
&& (!overlay_debugging
|| breakpoint_chain->section == sal.section))
|| ((default_match || (0 == sal.pc))
&& breakpoint_chain->source_file != NULL
&& sal.symtab != NULL
&& STREQ (breakpoint_chain->source_file, sal.symtab->filename)
&& breakpoint_chain->line_number == sal.line)))
prev = NULL;
/* Find all matching breakpoints, remove them from the
breakpoint chain, and add them to the 'found' chain. */
ALL_BREAKPOINTS_SAFE (b, tmp)
{
b1 = breakpoint_chain;
breakpoint_chain = b1->next;
b1->next = found;
found = b1;
}
ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
while (b->next
&& b->next->type != bp_none
&& b->next->type != bp_watchpoint
&& b->next->type != bp_hardware_watchpoint
&& b->next->type != bp_read_watchpoint
&& b->next->type != bp_access_watchpoint
&& (((sal.pc && (b->next->address == sal.pc))
&& (!overlay_debugging || b->next->section == sal.section))
|| ((default_match || (0 == sal.pc))
&& b->next->source_file != NULL
&& sal.symtab != NULL
&& STREQ (b->next->source_file, sal.symtab->filename)
&& b->next->line_number == sal.line)))
{
b1 = b->next;
b->next = b1->next;
b1->next = found;
found = b1;
}
if (found == 0)
{
if (arg)
error ("No breakpoint at %s.", arg);
/* Are we going to delete b? */
if (b->type != bp_none
&& b->type != bp_watchpoint
&& b->type != bp_hardware_watchpoint
&& b->type != bp_read_watchpoint
&& b->type != bp_access_watchpoint
/* Not if b is a watchpoint of any sort... */
&& (((sal.pc && (b->address == sal.pc))
&& (!section_is_overlay (b->section)
|| b->section == sal.section))
/* Yes, if sal.pc matches b (modulo overlays). */
|| ((default_match || (0 == sal.pc))
&& b->source_file != NULL
&& sal.symtab != NULL
&& STREQ (b->source_file, sal.symtab->filename)
&& b->line_number == sal.line)))
/* Yes, if sal source file and line matches b. */
{
/* Remove it from breakpoint_chain... */
if (b == breakpoint_chain)
{
/* b is at the head of the list */
breakpoint_chain = b->next;
}
else
{
prev->next = b->next;
}
/* And add it to 'found' chain. */
b->next = found;
found = b;
}
else
error ("No breakpoint at this line.");
{
/* Keep b, and keep a pointer to it. */
prev = b;
}
}
if (found->next)
from_tty = 1; /* Always report if deleted more than one */
if (from_tty)
printf_unfiltered ("Deleted breakpoint%s ", found->next ? "s" : "");
breakpoints_changed ();
while (found)
{
if (from_tty)
printf_unfiltered ("%d ", found->number);
b1 = found->next;
delete_breakpoint (found);
found = b1;
}
if (from_tty)
putchar_unfiltered ('\n');
}
xfree (sals.sals);
/* Now go thru the 'found' chain and delete them. */
if (found == 0)
{
if (arg)
error ("No breakpoint at %s.", arg);
else
error ("No breakpoint at this line.");
}
if (found->next)
from_tty = 1; /* Always report if deleted more than one */
if (from_tty)
printf_unfiltered ("Deleted breakpoint%s ", found->next ? "s" : "");
breakpoints_changed ();
while (found)
{
if (from_tty)
printf_unfiltered ("%d ", found->number);
tmp = found->next;
delete_breakpoint (found);
found = tmp;
}
if (from_tty)
putchar_unfiltered ('\n');
}
/* Delete breakpoint in BS if they are `delete' breakpoints and