darkkirb/old-cross-binutils
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

* stabs.texinfo (String Field): Discuss continuing stabs with ?.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jim Kingdon 1994-01-25 17:42:20 +00:00
parent 91a0575c8a
commit 41d7671d53
2 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
Tue Jan 25 12:12:04 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
* stabs.texinfo (String Field): Discuss continuing stabs with ?.
Wed Jan 19 06:39:24 1994 David J. Mackenzie (djm@thepub.cygnus.com) Wed Jan 19 06:39:24 1994 David J. Mackenzie (djm@thepub.cygnus.com)
* stabs.texinfo (Non-Stab Symbol Types): Mention N_SET* | N_EXT. * stabs.texinfo (Non-Stab Symbol Types): Mention N_SET* | N_EXT.

4
gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo
View file

@ -282,7 +282,9 @@ except the string field. The string field of every stab except the last
is marked as continued with a backslash at the end (in the assembly code is marked as continued with a backslash at the end (in the assembly code
this may be written as a double backslash, depending on the assembler). this may be written as a double backslash, depending on the assembler).
Removing the backslashes and concatenating the string fields of each Removing the backslashes and concatenating the string fields of each
stab produces the original, long string. stab produces the original, long string. Just to be incompatible (or so
they don't have to worry about what the assembler does with
backslashes), AIX can use @samp{?} instead of backslash.
@node C Example @node C Example
@section A Simple Example in C Source @section A Simple Example in C Source