* gdb.base/funcargs.exp: Use gdb_run_cmd to start program.

This commit is contained in:
J.T. Conklin 1994-07-19 22:57:29 +00:00
parent 4704ece79f
commit 27b4d34f08

View file

@ -54,16 +54,14 @@ proc integral_args {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call0a \[(\]+c=97 'a', s=1, i=2, l=3\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call0a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call0a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
# Print each arg as a double check to see if we can print
# them here as well as with backtrace.
@ -123,16 +121,13 @@ proc unsigned_integral_args {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call1a \[(\]+uc=98 'b', us=6, ui=7, ul=8\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call1a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call1a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
# Print each arg as a double check to see if we can print
# them here as well as with backtrace.
@ -198,19 +193,15 @@ proc float_and_integral_args {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call2a \[(\]+c=97 'a', f1=4, s=1, d1=5, i=2, f2=4, l=3, d2=5\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call2a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call2a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
# Print each arg as a double check to see if we can print
if [gdb_test "print c" ".* = 97 'a'" ""] {
fail "print c"; return
}
@ -297,19 +288,16 @@ proc pointer_args {} {
# Run; should stop at call3a and print actual arguments.
# Try dereferencing the arguments.
send "run\n"
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call3a \[(\]+cp=$hex \"a\", sp=$hex, ip=$hex, lp=$hex\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call3a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call3a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
if [gdb_test "print *cp" ".* = 97 'a'" ""] {
fail "print *cp"; return
@ -379,16 +367,13 @@ proc structs_by_reference {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call4a \[(\]+stp=$hex\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call4a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call4a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
if [gdb_test "print *stp" ".* = \{s1 = 101, s2 = 102\}" ""] {
fail "print *stp"; return
@ -428,16 +413,13 @@ proc structs_by_value {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".* call5a \[(\]+st=\{s1 = 101, s2 = 102\}\[)\]+ .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call5a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call5a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
if [gdb_test "print st" ".* = \{s1 = 101, s2 = 102\}" ""] {
fail "print st"; return
@ -486,16 +468,13 @@ proc discard_and_shuffle {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".*Breakpoint $decimal, call6a .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call6a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call6a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
send "backtrace 100\n"
expect {
@ -797,16 +776,13 @@ proc shuffle_round_robin {} {
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.
setup_xfail "a29k-*-udi"
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".*Breakpoint $decimal, call7a .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to call7a" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to call7a" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
setup_xfail "i960-*-*" 1813
send "backtrace 100\n"
@ -1093,17 +1069,13 @@ proc recursive_structs_by_value {} {
# Run; should stop at hitbottom and print actual arguments.
# Print backtrace.
send "run\n"
expect {
-re "The program .* has been started already.* \[(\]+y or n\[)\]+ $" {
send "y\n"
exp_continue
}
expect_after {
-re ".*Breakpoint $decimal, hitbottom .*$prompt $" {}
-re "$prompt $" { fail "run to hitbottom" ; return }
timeout { fail "(timeout) run to hitbottom" ; return }
}
gdb_run_cmd
expect_after;
# The a29k fails all of these tests, perhaps because the prologue
# code is broken.