darkkirb/old-cross-binutils
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

#ifdef OBJ_SOM, not #ifdef SOM

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Alan Modra 2000-07-19 06:30:49 +00:00
parent 2ec0158338
commit 25a8b2508d
2 changed files with 21 additions and 14 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gas/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2000-07-19 Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
* config/tc-hppa.c (hppa_fix_adjustable): Correct LR%/RR% comment.
(arg_reloc_stub_needed): #ifdef OBJ_SOM, not #ifdef SOM.
(pa_type_args): Same here.
2000-07-17 Mark Elbrecht <snowball3@bigfoot.com>
* config/obj-coff.c (obj_frob_symbol): Don't merge labels. Don't

29
gas/config/tc-hppa.c
View file

@ -4390,7 +4390,7 @@ md_undefined_symbol (name)
return 0;
}
#if defined (SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
#if defined (OBJ_SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
#define arg_reloc_stub_needed(CALLER, CALLEE) \
((CALLEE) && (CALLER) && ((CALLEE) != (CALLER)))
#else
@ -6715,7 +6715,7 @@ pa_type_args (symbolP, is_export)
name = input_line_pointer;
c = get_symbol_end ();
arg_reloc = pa_align_arg_reloc (temp, pa_build_arg_reloc (name));
#if defined (SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
#if defined (OBJ_SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
symbol_arg_reloc_info (symbolP) |= arg_reloc;
#endif
*input_line_pointer = c;
@ -6729,7 +6729,7 @@ pa_type_args (symbolP, is_export)
name = input_line_pointer;
c = get_symbol_end ();
arg_reloc = pa_build_arg_reloc (name);
#if defined (SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
#if defined (OBJ_SOM) || defined (ELF_ARG_RELOC)
symbol_arg_reloc_info (symbolP) |= arg_reloc;
#endif
*input_line_pointer = c;
@ -8373,19 +8373,20 @@ hppa_fix_adjustable (fixp)
eg. Suppose we have
. ldil LR%foo+0,%r21
. ldw RR%foo+0(%r21),%r26
. ldw RR%foo+10(%r21),%r25
. ldw RR%foo+4(%r21),%r25
If foo is at address 4090 (decimal) in section `sect', then after
reducing to the section symbol, we get
. LR%sect+4090 == L%sect+0
. RR%sect+4090 == R%sect+4090
. RR%sect+4100 == R%sect-4092 (4100 - 8192)
and the last address loses.
If foo is at address 4092 (decimal) in section `sect', then after
reducing to the section symbol we get
. LR%sect+4092 == (L%sect)+0
. RR%sect+4092 == (R%sect)+4092
. RR%sect+4096 == (R%sect)-4096
and the last address loses because rounding the addend to 8k
mutiples takes us up to 8192 with an offset of -4096.
Obviously, in cases where the LR% expression is identical to the
RR% one we will never have a problem, but is so happens that gcc
rounds addends involved in LR% field selectors to work around a
HP linker bug. ie. We often have addresses like the last case
In cases where the LR% expression is identical to the RR% one we
will never have a problem, but is so happens that gcc rounds
addends involved in LR% field selectors to work around a HP
linker bug. ie. We often have addresses like the last case
above where the LR% expression is offset from the RR% one. */
if (hppa_fix->fx_r_field == e_lrsel