2004-05-01 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* frame.c (create_sentinel_frame): Set type to SENTINEL_FRAME. * dummy-frame.c (dummy_frame_this_id): Use get_frame_type, instead of frame_relative_level. * sentinel-frame.c (sentinel_frame_unwinder): Set unwinder's type to SENTINEL_FRAME. * frame.h (enum frame_type): Add SENTINEL_FRAME. * s390-tdep.c (s390_prologue_frame_unwind_cache): Delete calls to frame_relative_level.
This commit is contained in:
parent
55699d593f
commit
0e100dab2e
6 changed files with 25 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
|
|||
2004-05-01 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* frame.c (create_sentinel_frame): Set type to SENTINEL_FRAME.
|
||||
* dummy-frame.c (dummy_frame_this_id): Use get_frame_type, instead
|
||||
of frame_relative_level.
|
||||
* sentinel-frame.c (sentinel_frame_unwinder): Set unwinder's type
|
||||
to SENTINEL_FRAME.
|
||||
* frame.h (enum frame_type): Add SENTINEL_FRAME.
|
||||
* s390-tdep.c (s390_prologue_frame_unwind_cache): Delete calls to
|
||||
frame_relative_level.
|
||||
|
||||
2004-05-01 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* frame.h (deprecated_set_frame_type): Delete declaration.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ dummy_frame_this_id (struct frame_info *next_frame,
|
|||
determine the dummy frame's ID. */
|
||||
(*this_id) = gdbarch_unwind_dummy_id (current_gdbarch, next_frame);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (frame_relative_level (next_frame) < 0)
|
||||
else if (get_frame_type (next_frame) == SENTINEL_FRAME)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We're unwinding a sentinel frame, the PC of which is pointing
|
||||
at a stack dummy. Fake up the dummy frame's ID using the
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct frame_info *
|
|||
create_sentinel_frame (struct regcache *regcache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct frame_info *frame = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (struct frame_info);
|
||||
frame->type = NORMAL_FRAME;
|
||||
frame->type = SENTINEL_FRAME;
|
||||
frame->level = -1;
|
||||
/* Explicitly initialize the sentinel frame's cache. Provide it
|
||||
with the underlying regcache. In the future additional
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -355,7 +355,10 @@ enum frame_type
|
|||
DUMMY_FRAME,
|
||||
/* In a signal handler, various OSs handle this in various ways.
|
||||
The main thing is that the frame may be far from normal. */
|
||||
SIGTRAMP_FRAME
|
||||
SIGTRAMP_FRAME,
|
||||
/* Sentinel or registers frame. This frame obtains register values
|
||||
direct from the inferior's registers. */
|
||||
SENTINEL_FRAME
|
||||
};
|
||||
extern enum frame_type get_frame_type (struct frame_info *);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1803,10 +1803,10 @@ s390_prologue_frame_unwind_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame,
|
|||
/* If the next frame is a NORMAL_FRAME, this frame *cannot* have frame
|
||||
size zero. This is only possible if the next frame is a sentinel
|
||||
frame, a dummy frame, or a signal trampoline frame. */
|
||||
if (get_frame_type (next_frame) == NORMAL_FRAME
|
||||
/* For some reason, sentinel frames are NORMAL_FRAMEs
|
||||
-- but they have negative frame level. */
|
||||
&& frame_relative_level (next_frame) >= 0)
|
||||
/* FIXME: cagney/2004-05-01: This sanity check shouldn't be
|
||||
needed, instead the code should simpliy rely on its
|
||||
analysis. */
|
||||
if (get_frame_type (next_frame) == NORMAL_FRAME)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we really have a frameless function, %r14 must be valid
|
||||
|
@ -1850,9 +1850,9 @@ s390_prologue_frame_unwind_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame,
|
|||
treat it as frameless if we're currently within the function epilog
|
||||
code at a point where the frame pointer has already been restored.
|
||||
This can only happen in an innermost frame. */
|
||||
if (size > 0
|
||||
&& (get_frame_type (next_frame) != NORMAL_FRAME
|
||||
|| frame_relative_level (next_frame) < 0))
|
||||
/* FIXME: cagney/2004-05-01: This sanity check shouldn't be needed,
|
||||
instead the code should simpliy rely on its analysis. */
|
||||
if (size > 0 && get_frame_type (next_frame) != NORMAL_FRAME)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* See the comment in s390_in_function_epilogue_p on why this is
|
||||
not completely reliable ... */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ sentinel_frame_this_id (struct frame_info *next_frame,
|
|||
|
||||
const struct frame_unwind sentinel_frame_unwinder =
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Should the sentinel frame be given a special type? */
|
||||
NORMAL_FRAME,
|
||||
SENTINEL_FRAME,
|
||||
sentinel_frame_this_id,
|
||||
sentinel_frame_prev_register
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue