old-cross-binutils/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp

70 lines
2.5 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

# Copyright 2015-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test ability to load an elf64-i386 core file. The provided core file was
# elf64-x8664 one but it got binary patched to i386:
# Elf32_Ehdr.e_machine @0x12..0x13
# Elf64_Ehdr.e_machine @0x12..0x13
# #define EM_386 3 /* Intel 80386 */
# #define EM_X86_64 62 /* AMD x86-64 architecture */
# patch @0x12: 0x3E -> 0x03
standard_testfile
Fix gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp FAIL on i386. This new test fails on i686 buildbot slaves, (gdb) core-file /home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core "/home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core" is not a core dump: File format not recognized (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file There are two problems: (1) The testcase did not really test if elf64-i386 is supported by GDB (BFD). That was OK for a Fedora testcase but I forgot about it when submitting it upstream. I haven't really verified if the GNU target is elf64-little but it seems so, no other one seems suitable from: elf32-x86-64 elf64-big elf64-k1om elf64-l1om elf64-little elf64-x86-64 pei-x86-64 (2) The output of the "core-file" command itself can be arbitrary as the elf64-i386 file with x86_64 registers is really broken; but that does not matter much, important is the following test whether core file memory is readable. ./configure --enable-64-bit-bfd (gdb) core-file /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-test-build32-plus64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M #0 <unavailable> in ?? ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file x/i 0x400078^M 0x400078: hlt ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: .text is readable I do not know much dejagnu but I expect 'istarget' tests against the site.exp 'target_triplet' content which is set to the primary GDB target (--target=...). GDB is normally never configured for primary target elf64-i386, I think BFD does not know such explicit target, it gets recognized as elf64-little. In fact many testfiles of the GDB testsuite are wrong as they require 'istarget' (therefore primary GDB target) even for just loading arch specific files which would be sufficient with secondary target (--enable-targets=...) support. This my new patch removes this 'istarget' check as it is IMO unrelated to what we need to test. Although you are right we do 'x/i' and test for 'hlt' so I think we should test also for available 'set architecture i386'. We could also test by 'x/bx' instead of 'x/i' to avoid such additional test/requirement. This testcase comes from a different bug from 2009: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457187 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/commit/?id=94cd124608bf0dd359cb48a710800d72c21b30c3 That bug has been fixed in the meantime but the same testcase was reproducing this new different bug - internal error regression - so I submitted it. We can remove the "x/bx $address" test but it was useful for the previous bug from 2009 as that time the internal error regression did not happen, just the core file was not recognized (which would not be detected by the proposed ignoring of the "core-file" command output) and so the core file was not available. That can be tested by the "x/bx $address" test. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2015-07-16 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: Replace istarget by "complete set gnutarget". Remove expectation for the "core-file" command.
2015-07-16 16:01:22 +00:00
gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
set test "complete set gnutarget"
gdb_test_multiple "complete set gnutarget " $test {
-re "set gnutarget elf64-little\r\n(.*\r\n)?$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $test
}
-re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $test
untested ".text is readable"
return
}
}
set corebz2file ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}.core.bz2
set corefile [standard_output_file ${testfile}.core]
# Entry point of the original executable.
set address 0x400078
if {[catch "system \"bzip2 -dc ${corebz2file} >${corefile}\""] != 0} {
untested "failed bzip2"
return -1
}
file stat ${corefile} corestat
if {$corestat(size) != 102400} {
untested "bzip2 produces invalid result"
return -1
}
# Wrongly built GDB complains by:
# "..." is not a core dump: File format not recognized
# As the provided test core has 64bit PRSTATUS i386 built GDB cannot parse it.
# This is just a problem of the test case, real-world elf64-i386 file will have
# 32bit PRSTATUS. One cannot prepare elf64-i386 core file from elf32-i386 by
# objcopy as it corrupts the core file beyond all recognition.
Fix gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp FAIL on i386. This new test fails on i686 buildbot slaves, (gdb) core-file /home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core "/home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core" is not a core dump: File format not recognized (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file There are two problems: (1) The testcase did not really test if elf64-i386 is supported by GDB (BFD). That was OK for a Fedora testcase but I forgot about it when submitting it upstream. I haven't really verified if the GNU target is elf64-little but it seems so, no other one seems suitable from: elf32-x86-64 elf64-big elf64-k1om elf64-l1om elf64-little elf64-x86-64 pei-x86-64 (2) The output of the "core-file" command itself can be arbitrary as the elf64-i386 file with x86_64 registers is really broken; but that does not matter much, important is the following test whether core file memory is readable. ./configure --enable-64-bit-bfd (gdb) core-file /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-test-build32-plus64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M #0 <unavailable> in ?? ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file x/i 0x400078^M 0x400078: hlt ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: .text is readable I do not know much dejagnu but I expect 'istarget' tests against the site.exp 'target_triplet' content which is set to the primary GDB target (--target=...). GDB is normally never configured for primary target elf64-i386, I think BFD does not know such explicit target, it gets recognized as elf64-little. In fact many testfiles of the GDB testsuite are wrong as they require 'istarget' (therefore primary GDB target) even for just loading arch specific files which would be sufficient with secondary target (--enable-targets=...) support. This my new patch removes this 'istarget' check as it is IMO unrelated to what we need to test. Although you are right we do 'x/i' and test for 'hlt' so I think we should test also for available 'set architecture i386'. We could also test by 'x/bx' instead of 'x/i' to avoid such additional test/requirement. This testcase comes from a different bug from 2009: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457187 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/commit/?id=94cd124608bf0dd359cb48a710800d72c21b30c3 That bug has been fixed in the meantime but the same testcase was reproducing this new different bug - internal error regression - so I submitted it. We can remove the "x/bx $address" test but it was useful for the previous bug from 2009 as that time the internal error regression did not happen, just the core file was not recognized (which would not be detected by the proposed ignoring of the "core-file" command output) and so the core file was not available. That can be tested by the "x/bx $address" test. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2015-07-16 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: Replace istarget by "complete set gnutarget". Remove expectation for the "core-file" command.
2015-07-16 16:01:22 +00:00
# The output therefore does not matter much, just we should not get GDB
# internal error.
gdb_test "core-file ${corefile}" ".*" "core-file"
Fix gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp FAIL on i386. This new test fails on i686 buildbot slaves, (gdb) core-file /home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core "/home/gdb-buildbot-2/fedora-x86-64-2/fedora-i686/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core" is not a core dump: File format not recognized (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file There are two problems: (1) The testcase did not really test if elf64-i386 is supported by GDB (BFD). That was OK for a Fedora testcase but I forgot about it when submitting it upstream. I haven't really verified if the GNU target is elf64-little but it seems so, no other one seems suitable from: elf32-x86-64 elf64-big elf64-k1om elf64-l1om elf64-little elf64-x86-64 pei-x86-64 (2) The output of the "core-file" command itself can be arbitrary as the elf64-i386 file with x86_64 registers is really broken; but that does not matter much, important is the following test whether core file memory is readable. ./configure --enable-64-bit-bfd (gdb) core-file /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-test-build32-plus64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.^M warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M #0 <unavailable> in ?? ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file x/i 0x400078^M 0x400078: hlt ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: .text is readable I do not know much dejagnu but I expect 'istarget' tests against the site.exp 'target_triplet' content which is set to the primary GDB target (--target=...). GDB is normally never configured for primary target elf64-i386, I think BFD does not know such explicit target, it gets recognized as elf64-little. In fact many testfiles of the GDB testsuite are wrong as they require 'istarget' (therefore primary GDB target) even for just loading arch specific files which would be sufficient with secondary target (--enable-targets=...) support. This my new patch removes this 'istarget' check as it is IMO unrelated to what we need to test. Although you are right we do 'x/i' and test for 'hlt' so I think we should test also for available 'set architecture i386'. We could also test by 'x/bx' instead of 'x/i' to avoid such additional test/requirement. This testcase comes from a different bug from 2009: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457187 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/commit/?id=94cd124608bf0dd359cb48a710800d72c21b30c3 That bug has been fixed in the meantime but the same testcase was reproducing this new different bug - internal error regression - so I submitted it. We can remove the "x/bx $address" test but it was useful for the previous bug from 2009 as that time the internal error regression did not happen, just the core file was not recognized (which would not be detected by the proposed ignoring of the "core-file" command output) and so the core file was not available. That can be tested by the "x/bx $address" test. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2015-07-16 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: Replace istarget by "complete set gnutarget". Remove expectation for the "core-file" command.
2015-07-16 16:01:22 +00:00
# Test if at least the core file segments memory has been loaded.
# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457187
gdb_test "x/bx $address" "\r\n\[ \t\]*$address:\[ \t\]*0xf4\[ \t\]*" ".text is readable"