old-cross-binutils/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp

114 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

# Copyright (C) 2011-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Make sure we don't resume the stepped thread by accident. Say: <stopped at a breakpoint in thread 2> (gdb) thread 3 (gdb) step The above triggers the prepare_to_proceed/deferred_step_ptid process, which switches back to thread 2, to step over its breakpoint before getting back to thread 3 and "step" it. If while stepping over the breakpoint in thread 2, a signal arrives, and it is set to pass/nostop, we'll set a step-resume breakpoint at the supposed signal-handler resume address, and call keep_going. The problem is that we were supposedly stepping thread 3, and that keep_going delivers a signal to thread 2, and due to scheduler-locking off, resumes everything else, _including_ thread 3, the thread we want stepping. This means that we lose control of thread 3 until the next event, when we stop everything. The end result for the user, is that GDB lost control of the "step". Here's the current infrun debug output of the above, with the testcase in the patch below: infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab4f2b20 (LWP 11659)) infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=144, step=1) infrun: prepare_to_proceed (step=1), switched to [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f infrun: wait_for_inferior () infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGUSR1 infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: random signal 30 Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. infrun: signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x40098f infrun: resume (step=0, signal=30), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ this is a wildcard resume. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_STEP_RESUME infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ step-resume hit, meaning the handler returned, so we go back to stepping thread 3. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40088b infrun: switching back to stepped thread infrun: Switching context from Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662) to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663) infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x400938 infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40093a infrun: keep going infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x40093a infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40091e infrun: stepped to a different line infrun: stop_stepping [Switching to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] 69 (*myp) ++; /* set breakpoint child_two here */ ^^^ we stopped at the wrong line. We still stepped a bit because the test is running in a loop, and when we got back to stepping thread 3, it happened to be in the stepping range. (The loop increments a counter, and the test makes sure it increments exactly once. Without the fix, the counter increments a bunch, since the user-stepped thread runs free without GDB noticing.) The fix is to switch to the stepping thread before continuing for the step-resume breakpoint. gdb/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (handle_signal_stop) <signal arrives while stepping over a breakpoint>: Switch back to the stepping thread. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.c: New file. * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.exp: New file.
2014-02-07 19:11:25 +00:00
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test that GDB doesn't inadvertently resume the stepped thread when a
# signal arrives while stepping over the breakpoint that last caused a
# stop, when the thread that hit that breakpoint is not the stepped
# thread.
standard_testfile
set executable ${testfile}
if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
verbose "Skipping ${testfile}.exp because of nosignals."
return -1
}
if {[gdb_compile_pthreads "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" \
executable [list debug "incdir=${objdir}"]] != "" } {
return -1
}
proc get_value {var test} {
global expect_out
global gdb_prompt
global decimal
set value -1
gdb_test_multiple "print $var" "$test" {
-re ".*= ($decimal).*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set value $expect_out(1,string)
pass "$test"
}
}
return ${value}
}
# Start with a fresh gdb.
clean_restart $executable
if ![runto_main] {
return -1
}
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set wait-thread-2 breakpoint here"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to wait-thread-2 breakpoint"
gdb_test "info threads" "" "info threads with thread 2"
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set wait-thread-3 breakpoint here"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to breakpoint"
gdb_test "info threads" "" "info threads with thread 3"
gdb_test "set scheduler-locking on"
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint child_two here"]
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint child_one here"]
gdb_test "thread 3" "" "switch to thread 3 to run to its breakpoint"
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to breakpoint in thread 3"
gdb_test "thread 2" "" "switch to thread 2 to run to its breakpoint"
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "run to breakpoint in thread 2"
delete_breakpoints
gdb_test "b *\$pc" "" "set breakpoint to be stepped over"
# Make sure the first loop breaks without hitting the breakpoint
# again.
gdb_test "p *myp = 0" " = 0" "force loop break in thread 2"
# We want "print" to make sure the target reports the signal to the
# core.
gdb_test "handle SIGUSR1 print nostop pass" "" ""
gdb_test "thread 1" "" "switch to thread 1 to queue signal in thread 2"
gdb_test "next 2" "pthread_join .*" "queue signal in thread 2"
Make sure we don't resume the stepped thread by accident. Say: <stopped at a breakpoint in thread 2> (gdb) thread 3 (gdb) step The above triggers the prepare_to_proceed/deferred_step_ptid process, which switches back to thread 2, to step over its breakpoint before getting back to thread 3 and "step" it. If while stepping over the breakpoint in thread 2, a signal arrives, and it is set to pass/nostop, we'll set a step-resume breakpoint at the supposed signal-handler resume address, and call keep_going. The problem is that we were supposedly stepping thread 3, and that keep_going delivers a signal to thread 2, and due to scheduler-locking off, resumes everything else, _including_ thread 3, the thread we want stepping. This means that we lose control of thread 3 until the next event, when we stop everything. The end result for the user, is that GDB lost control of the "step". Here's the current infrun debug output of the above, with the testcase in the patch below: infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab4f2b20 (LWP 11659)) infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=144, step=1) infrun: prepare_to_proceed (step=1), switched to [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f infrun: wait_for_inferior () infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGUSR1 infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: random signal 30 Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. infrun: signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x40098f infrun: resume (step=0, signal=30), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ this is a wildcard resume. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_STEP_RESUME infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ step-resume hit, meaning the handler returned, so we go back to stepping thread 3. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40088b infrun: switching back to stepped thread infrun: Switching context from Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662) to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663) infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x400938 infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40093a infrun: keep going infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x40093a infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40091e infrun: stepped to a different line infrun: stop_stepping [Switching to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] 69 (*myp) ++; /* set breakpoint child_two here */ ^^^ we stopped at the wrong line. We still stepped a bit because the test is running in a loop, and when we got back to stepping thread 3, it happened to be in the stepping range. (The loop increments a counter, and the test makes sure it increments exactly once. Without the fix, the counter increments a bunch, since the user-stepped thread runs free without GDB noticing.) The fix is to switch to the stepping thread before continuing for the step-resume breakpoint. gdb/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (handle_signal_stop) <signal arrives while stepping over a breakpoint>: Switch back to the stepping thread. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.c: New file. * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.exp: New file.
2014-02-07 19:11:25 +00:00
gdb_test "thread 3" "" "switch to thread 3 for stepping"
set my_number [get_value "my_number" "get my_number"]
set cnt_before [get_value "args\[$my_number\]" "get count before step"]
gdb_test "set scheduler-locking off"
# Make sure we're exercising the paths we want to.
gdb_test "set debug infrun 1"
gdb_test \
"step" \
Handle multiple step-overs. This test fails with current mainline. If the program stopped for a breakpoint in thread 1, and then the user switches to thread 2, and resumes the program, GDB first switches back to thread 1 to step it over the breakpoint, in order to make progress. However, that logic only considers the last reported event, assuming only one thread needs that stepping over dance. That's actually not true when we play with scheduler-locking. The patch adds an example to the testsuite of multiple threads needing a step-over before the stepping thread can be resumed. With current mainline, the program re-traps the same breakpoint it had already trapped before. E.g.: Breakpoint 2, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:99 99 wait_threads (); /* set wait-threads breakpoint here */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: continue to breakpoint: run to breakpoint info threads Id Target Id Frame 3 Thread 0x7ffff77c9700 (LWP 4310) "multiple-step-o" 0x00000000004007ca in child_function_3 (arg=0x1) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:43 2 Thread 0x7ffff7fca700 (LWP 4309) "multiple-step-o" 0x0000000000400827 in child_function_2 (arg=0x0) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:60 * 1 Thread 0x7ffff7fcb740 (LWP 4305) "multiple-step-o" main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:99 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: info threads shows all threads set scheduler-locking on (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: set scheduler-locking on break 44 Breakpoint 3 at 0x4007d3: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c, line 44. (gdb) break 61 Breakpoint 4 at 0x40082d: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c, line 61. (gdb) thread 3 [Switching to thread 3 (Thread 0x7ffff77c9700 (LWP 4310))] #0 0x00000000004007ca in child_function_3 (arg=0x1) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:43 43 (*myp) ++; (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: thread 3 continue Continuing. Breakpoint 3, child_function_3 (arg=0x1) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:44 44 callme (); /* set breakpoint thread 3 here */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: continue to breakpoint: run to breakpoint in thread 3 p *myp = 0 $1 = 0 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: unbreak loop in thread 3 thread 2 [Switching to thread 2 (Thread 0x7ffff7fca700 (LWP 4309))] #0 0x0000000000400827 in child_function_2 (arg=0x0) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:60 60 (*myp) ++; (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: thread 2 continue Continuing. Breakpoint 4, child_function_2 (arg=0x0) at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:61 61 callme (); /* set breakpoint thread 2 here */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: continue to breakpoint: run to breakpoint in thread 2 p *myp = 0 $2 = 0 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: unbreak loop in thread 2 thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff7fcb740 (LWP 4305))] #0 main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:99 99 wait_threads (); /* set wait-threads breakpoint here */ (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: thread 1 set scheduler-locking off (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step: set scheduler-locking off At this point all thread are stopped for a breakpoint that needs stepping over. (gdb) step Breakpoint 2, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:99 99 wait_threads (); /* set wait-threads breakpoint here */ (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: step But that "step" retriggers the same breakpoint instead of making progress. The patch teaches GDB to step over all breakpoints of all threads before resuming the stepping thread. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17, against pristine mainline, and also my branch that implements software single-stepping on x86. gdb/ 2014-03-20 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (prepare_to_proceed): Delete. (thread_still_needs_step_over): New function. (find_thread_needs_step_over): New function. (proceed): If the current thread needs a step-over, set its steping_over_breakpoint flag. Adjust to use find_thread_needs_step_over instead of prepare_to_proceed. (process_event_stop_test): For BPSTAT_WHAT_STOP_NOISY and BPSTAT_WHAT_STOP_SILENT, assume the thread stopped for a breakpoint. (switch_back_to_stepped_thread): Step over breakpoints of all threads not the stepping thread, before switching back to the stepping thread. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-03-20 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c: New file. * gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: New file. * gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: Adjust expected infrun debug output.
2014-03-20 13:26:32 +00:00
".*need to step-over.*resume \\(step=1.*signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint.*switching back to stepped thread.*stepped to a different line.*callme.*" \
Make sure we don't resume the stepped thread by accident. Say: <stopped at a breakpoint in thread 2> (gdb) thread 3 (gdb) step The above triggers the prepare_to_proceed/deferred_step_ptid process, which switches back to thread 2, to step over its breakpoint before getting back to thread 3 and "step" it. If while stepping over the breakpoint in thread 2, a signal arrives, and it is set to pass/nostop, we'll set a step-resume breakpoint at the supposed signal-handler resume address, and call keep_going. The problem is that we were supposedly stepping thread 3, and that keep_going delivers a signal to thread 2, and due to scheduler-locking off, resumes everything else, _including_ thread 3, the thread we want stepping. This means that we lose control of thread 3 until the next event, when we stop everything. The end result for the user, is that GDB lost control of the "step". Here's the current infrun debug output of the above, with the testcase in the patch below: infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)) infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 0x2aaaab4f2b20 (LWP 11659)) infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=144, step=1) infrun: prepare_to_proceed (step=1), switched to [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f infrun: wait_for_inferior () infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGUSR1 infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: random signal 30 Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. infrun: signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x40098f infrun: resume (step=0, signal=30), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ this is a wildcard resume. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40098f infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_STEP_RESUME infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=1, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)] at 0x40098f ^^^ step-resume hit, meaning the handler returned, so we go back to stepping thread 3. infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40088b infrun: switching back to stepped thread infrun: Switching context from Thread 0x2aaaab6f4700 (LWP 11662) to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663) infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x400938 infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40093a infrun: keep going infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] at 0x40093a infrun: prepare_to_wait infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 11659 [Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGTRAP infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x40091e infrun: stepped to a different line infrun: stop_stepping [Switching to Thread 0x2aaaab8f5700 (LWP 11663)] 69 (*myp) ++; /* set breakpoint child_two here */ ^^^ we stopped at the wrong line. We still stepped a bit because the test is running in a loop, and when we got back to stepping thread 3, it happened to be in the stepping range. (The loop increments a counter, and the test makes sure it increments exactly once. Without the fix, the counter increments a bunch, since the user-stepped thread runs free without GDB noticing.) The fix is to switch to the stepping thread before continuing for the step-resume breakpoint. gdb/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (handle_signal_stop) <signal arrives while stepping over a breakpoint>: Switch back to the stepping thread. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-02-07 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.c: New file. * gdb.threads/step-after-sr-lock.exp: New file.
2014-02-07 19:11:25 +00:00
"step"
set cnt_after [get_value "args\[$my_number\]" "get count after step"]
# Test that GDB doesn't inadvertently resume the stepped thread when a
# signal arrives while stepping over a breakpoint in another thread.
set test "stepped thread under control"
if { $cnt_before + 1 == $cnt_after } {
pass $test
} else {
fail $test
}