old-cross-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr14926.d

#ld: -Ttext=0x60
#readelf: -S --wide
#notarget: d10v-* m68hc1*-* msp*-* visium-* xgate-* xstormy*-*
# the above targets use memory regions that don't allow 0x60 for .text

#...
  \[[ 0-9]+\] \.text[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+0*60[ \t]+.*
#pass
Add a testase for PR ld/14926 PR ld/14926 * ld-elf/pr14926.d: New file. * ld-elf/pr14926.s: Likewise. 2012-12-07 12:32:50 +00:00			`#ld: -Ttext=0x60`
Use "readelf -S --wide" on ld-elf/pr14926.d * ld-elf/pr14926.d: Use "readelf -S --wide". 2012-12-07 22:30:19 +00:00			`#readelf: -S --wide`
m68hc11/12 and xgate config.sub weirdness Oddly, config.sub converts a duple ending in -elf for these target to -unknown-none, which means they aren't seen as elf targets by binutils. So, counter that. This exposes a number of testsuite issues (ones you would have seen if configuring with a full triple, say m68hc11-unknown-elf). binutils/ * testsuite/lib/binutils-common.exp (is_elf_format): Return true for m68hc11/12 and xgate triples. gas/ * testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp: Exclude m68hc11/12 from m68k test. ld/ * testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp (check_shared_lib_support): Exclude xgate. * testsuite/ld-elf/endsym.d: xfail m68hc11/12 and xgate. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr14156a.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr14926.d: Don't run for m68hc11/12 and xgate. * testsuite/ld-elf/sec64k.exp: Likewise. 2016-01-17 01:43:43 +00:00			`#notarget: d10v-* m68hc1- msp- visium-* xgate-* xstormy-`
* ld-elf/pr14926.d: Disable for d10v, msp, xstormy. * ld-elf/sec-to-seg.exp: Choose correct variant output to suit updated microblaze page size. 2013-01-14 13:23:05 +00:00			`# the above targets use memory regions that don't allow 0x60 for .text`
Add a testase for PR ld/14926 PR ld/14926 * ld-elf/pr14926.d: New file. * ld-elf/pr14926.s: Likewise. 2012-12-07 12:32:50 +00:00
			`#...`
			`\[[ 0-9]+\] \.text[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+060[ \t]+.`
Use "readelf -S --wide" on ld-elf/pr14926.d * ld-elf/pr14926.d: Use "readelf -S --wide". 2012-12-07 22:30:19 +00:00			`#pass`