2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2004-01-04 14:06:00 +00:00
# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
if $tracelevel then {
strace $tracelevel
}
set prms_id 0
set bug_id 0
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
# test.
if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
fail "This target can not call functions"
continue
}
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
set testfile "structs"
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Create and source the file that provides information about the
# compiler used to compile the test case.
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-17 15:09:19 +00:00
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
return -1;
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
}
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
# the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
proc start_structs_test { types } {
global testfile
global srcfile
global binfile
global objdir
global subdir
global srcdir
global gdb_prompt
# Create the additional flags
set flags "debug"
set testfile "structs"
set n 0
for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
set m [I2A ${n}]
set t [lindex ${types} $n]
lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
append testfile "-" "$t"
}
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
# built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}
}
# Start with a fresh gdb.
2003-12-17 22:32:18 +00:00
gdb_exit
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
# Make certain that the output is consistent
gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
"set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
"set print address off; ${testfile}"
gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
"set width 0; ${testfile}"
# Advance to main
if { ![runto_main] } then {
gdb_suppress_tests;
}
2003-11-23 17:48:00 +00:00
# Get the debug format
get_debug_format
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
}
append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
"ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
}
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
# empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
# "zed" returns the invalid value.
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
proc foo { n } {
return [lindex {
"{}"
"{a = 49 '1'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
} $n]
}
proc zed { n } {
return [lindex {
"{}"
"{a = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
"{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
} $n]
}
# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
proc i2a { n } {
return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
}
proc I2A { n } {
return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
}
# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
global testfile
if [string match $file $testfile] {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
}
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
}
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
global testfile
if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
}
}
# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
# returning (or passing in a single structs.
# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
# this test.
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
# specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
proc test_struct_calls { n } {
global testfile
2003-11-17 15:09:19 +00:00
global gdb_prompt
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
# inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
# inferior function call's return value these should never fail
# Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
# examining the return value printed by GDB.
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
2004-06-10 21:38:03 +00:00
setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
# This test can never fail.
# Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
# stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
# examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
2004-06-10 21:38:03 +00:00
setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
2003-11-17 15:09:19 +00:00
}
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
# return-value.
# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
# function and display the final source and line information.
# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
# this test.
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
# other.
proc test_struct_returns { n } {
global gdb_prompt
global testfile
set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
# Check that "return" works.
# GDB must always force the return of a function that has
# a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
# possible to store the return value in a register.
# The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
# "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
# snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
# is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
# compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
# the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
# consistency between this and the "finish" case.
# Get into a call of fun${n}
gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
"fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
"advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
# Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
2004-01-03 23:49:31 +00:00
gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
# performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
# GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
# known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
# the frame ("No frame").
# The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
# entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
# "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
# the return value was located.
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set return_value_known 1
2003-12-06 22:49:02 +00:00
set return_value_unimplemented 0
2003-11-23 01:09:19 +00:00
gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
-re "The location" {
# Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set return_value_known 0
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
exp_continue
}
-re "A structure or union" {
# Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set return_value_known 0
2003-12-06 22:49:02 +00:00
# Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
# hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
set return_value_unimplemented 1
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
exp_continue
}
-re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
2003-11-23 01:09:19 +00:00
gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
-re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# Need to step off the function call
gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
}
-re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
pass "${test}"
}
}
}
}
# Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
# just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
# "return_value_known" set above.
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
2003-11-23 01:09:19 +00:00
gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
-re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
if $return_value_known {
pass "${test}"
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
# know the location of the return-value.
} else {
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
fail "${test}"
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
}
}
-re " = [zed ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
if $return_value_known {
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
# the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
} else {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# The struct return case. Since any modification
# would be by reference, and that can't happen, the
# value should be unmodified and hence Z is expected.
# Is this a reasonable assumption?
pass "${test}"
}
}
2003-12-06 22:49:02 +00:00
-re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $return_value_unimplemented {
# What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
# return_value, and hence has to fail.
kfail "$test" gdb/1444
} else {
fail "$test"
}
}
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
}
# Check that a "finish" works.
# This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
# Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
# The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
# advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
# finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
# "p/c", is checked.
# Get into "fun${n}()".
gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
"fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
"advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
# Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
# Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
# the return-value was found.
2003-11-20 18:03:48 +00:00
set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set finish_value_known 1
2003-11-23 01:09:19 +00:00
gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
-re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
pass "${test}"
}
-re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set finish_value_known 0
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
pass "${test}"
}
}
# Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
# "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
# check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
2003-11-20 18:03:48 +00:00
set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
2003-11-23 01:09:19 +00:00
gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
-re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
if $finish_value_known {
pass "${test}"
} else {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
# know the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
}
}
-re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
# The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
if $finish_value_known {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
# know the location of the return-value.
fail "${test}"
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
} else {
pass "${test}"
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
}
}
}
# Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
# behavior.
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
# Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
# RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
# RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
# known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
# reverse).
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
2004-06-09 13:41:06 +00:00
} else {
pass "${test}"
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
}
2003-11-17 15:09:19 +00:00
}
2003-11-17 15:00:20 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
# possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
# range of the other types.
# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char
# structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
# original "structs" test was doing.
start_structs_test { tc }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_calls 7
test_struct_calls 8
test_struct_calls 9
test_struct_calls 10
test_struct_calls 11
test_struct_calls 12
test_struct_calls 13
test_struct_calls 14
test_struct_calls 15
test_struct_calls 16
test_struct_calls 17
test_struct_returns 1
test_struct_returns 2
test_struct_returns 3
test_struct_returns 4
test_struct_returns 5
test_struct_returns 6
test_struct_returns 7
test_struct_returns 8
# Let the fun begin.
# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
# returns" test up to that boundary.
# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
# tl=8.
# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
start_structs_test { ts }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_returns 1
test_struct_returns 2
test_struct_returns 3
test_struct_returns 4
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_structs_test { ti }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_returns 1
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_structs_test { tl }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_returns 1
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
start_structs_test { tll }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_returns 1
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
start_structs_test { tf }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_returns 1
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
start_structs_test { td }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_returns 1
# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
start_structs_test { tld }
test_struct_calls 1
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_returns 1
# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
start_structs_test { ts tc }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_calls 7
test_struct_calls 8
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
start_structs_test { ti tc }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
start_structs_test { tl tc }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
start_structs_test { tll tc }
test_struct_calls 2
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
start_structs_test { tf tc }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
start_structs_test { td tc }
test_struct_calls 2
# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
start_structs_test { tld tc }
test_struct_calls 2
# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
start_structs_test { tc ts }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_calls 5
test_struct_calls 6
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
start_structs_test { tc ti }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
start_structs_test { tc tl }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
test_struct_returns 2
# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
start_structs_test { tc tll }
test_struct_calls 2
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
start_structs_test { tc tf }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_calls 3
test_struct_calls 4
# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
start_structs_test { tc td }
test_struct_calls 2
# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
start_structs_test { tc tld }
test_struct_calls 2
# Some float combinations
# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
start_structs_test { td tf }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_returns 2
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
2003-11-20 17:11:55 +00:00
# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
start_structs_test { tf td }
test_struct_calls 2
test_struct_returns 2
1999-06-28 23:04:32 +00:00
return 0
