old-cross-binutils/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp

247 lines
7 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

Really fail inserting software breakpoints on read-only regions Currently, with "set breakpoint auto-hw off", we'll still try to insert a software breakpoint at addresses covered by supposedly read-only or inacessible regions: (top-gdb) mem 0x443000 0x450000 ro (top-gdb) set mem inaccessible-by-default off (top-gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000443956 <+34>: movq $0x0,0x10(%rax) => 0x000000000044395e <+42>: movq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 0x0000000000443966 <+50>: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax 0x0000000000443969 <+53>: mov %eax,-0x20(%rbp) End of assembler dump. (top-gdb) b *0x0000000000443969 Breakpoint 5 at 0x443969: file ../../src/gdb/gdb.c, line 29. (top-gdb) c Continuing. warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0x443969 Breakpoint 5, 0x0000000000443969 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd918) at ../../src/gdb/gdb.c:29 29 args.argc = argc; (top-gdb) We warn, saying that the insertion can't be done, but then proceed attempting the insertion anyway, and in case of manually added regions, the insert actually succeeds. This is a regression; GDB used to fail inserting the breakpoint. More below. I stumbled on this as I wrote a test that manually sets up a read-only memory region with the "mem" command, in order to test GDB's behavior with breakpoints set on read-only regions, even when the real memory the breakpoints are set at isn't really read-only. I wanted that in order to add a test that exercises software single-stepping through read-only regions. Note that the memory regions that target_memory_map returns aren't like e.g., what would expect to see in /proc/PID/maps on Linux. Instead, they're the physical memory map from the _debuggers_ perspective. E.g., a read-only region would be real ROM or flash memory, while a read-only+execute mapping in /proc/PID/maps is still read-write to the debugger (otherwise the debugger wouldn't be able to set software breakpoints in the code segment). If one tries to manually write to memory that falls within a memory region that is known to be read-only, with e.g., "p foo = 1", then we hit a check in memory_xfer_partial_1 before the write mananges to make it to the target side. But writing a software/memory breakpoint nowadays goes through target_write_raw_memory, and unlike when writing memory with TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, nothing on the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY path checks whether we're trying to write to a read-only region. At the time "breakpoint auto-hw" was added, we didn't have the TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY vs TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY target object distinction yet, and the code path in memory_xfer_partial that blocks writes to read-only memory was hit for memory breakpoints too. With GDB 6.8 we had: warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0000000000443943 Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Error accessing memory address 0x443943: Input/output error. So I started out by fixing this by adding the memory region validation to TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY too. But later, when testing against GDBserver, I realized that that would only block software/memory breakpoints GDB itself inserts with gdb/mem-break.c. If a target has a to_insert_breakpoint method, the insertion request will still pass through to the target. So I ended up converting the "cannot set breakpoint" warning in breakpoint.c to a real error return, thus blocking the insertion sooner. With that, we'll end up no longer needing the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY changes once software single-step breakpoints are converted to real breakpoints. We need them today as software single-step breakpoints bypass insert_bp_location. But, it'll be best to leave that in as safeguard anyway, for other direct uses of TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver. gdb/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Error out if inserting a software breakpoint at a read-only address. * target.c (memory_xfer_check_region): New function, factored out from ... (memory_xfer_partial_1): ... this. Make the 'reg_len' local a ULONGEST. (target_xfer_partial) <TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY>: Check the access against the memory region attributes. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c: New file. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp: New file.
2014-10-01 22:31:55 +00:00
# Copyright 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite
standard_testfile
if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } {
return -1
}
if ![runto main] {
return -1
}
delete_breakpoints
Put single-step breakpoints on the bp_location chain This patch makes single-step breakpoints "real" breakpoints on the global location list. There are several benefits to this: - It removes the currently limitation that only 2 single-step breakpoints can be inserted. See an example here of a discussion around a case that wants more than 2, possibly unbounded: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00663.html - makes software single-step work on read-only code regions. The logic to convert a software breakpoint to a hardware breakpoint if the memory map says the breakpoint address is in read only memory is in insert_bp_location. Because software single-step breakpoints bypass all that go and straight to target_insert_breakpoint, we can't software single-step over read only memory. This patch removes that limitation, and adds a test that makes sure that works, by forcing a code region to read-only with "mem LOW HIGH ro" and then stepping through that. - Fixes PR breakpoints/9649 This is an assertion failure in insert_single_step_breakpoint in breakpoint.c, because we may leave stale single-step breakpoints behind on error. The tests for stepping through read-only regions exercise the root cause of the bug, which is that we leave single-step breakpoints behind if we fail to insert any single-step breakpoint. Deleting the single-step breakpoints in resume_cleanups, delete_just_stopped_threads_infrun_breakpoints, and fetch_inferior_event fixes this. Without that, we'd no longer hit the assertion, as that code is deleted, but we'd instead run into errors/warnings trying to insert/remove the stale breakpoints on next resume. - Paves the way to have multiple threads software single-stepping at the same time, leaving update_global_location_list to worry about duplicate locations. - Makes the moribund location machinery aware of software single-step breakpoints, paving the way to enable software single-step on non-stop, instead of forcing serialized displaced stepping for all single steps. - It's generaly cleaner. We no longer have to play games with single-step breakpoints inserted at the same address as regular breakpoints, like we recently had to do for 7.8. See this discussion: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00052.html. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, on top of my 'single-step breakpoints on x86' series. gdb/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * breakpoint.c (single_step_breakpoints, single_step_gdbarch): Delete array globals. (single_step_breakpoints): New global. (breakpoint_xfer_memory): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (update_breakpoints_after_exec): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (detach_breakpoints): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (breakpoint_init_inferior): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (bpstat_stop_status): Add comment. (bpstat_what, bptype_string, print_one_breakpoint_location) (adjust_breakpoint_address, init_bp_location): Handle bp_single_step. (new_single_step_breakpoint): New function. (set_momentary_breakpoint, bkpt_remove_location): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (insert_single_step_breakpoint, single_step_breakpoints_inserted) (remove_single_step_breakpoints, cancel_single_step_breakpoints): Rewrite. (detach_single_step_breakpoints, find_single_step_breakpoint): Delete functions. (breakpoint_has_location_inserted_here): New function. (single_step_breakpoint_inserted_here_p): Rewrite. * breakpoint.h: Remove FIXME. (enum bptype) <bp_single_step>: New enum value. (insert_single_step_breakpoint): Update comment. * infrun.c (resume_cleanups) (delete_step_thread_step_resume_breakpoint): Remove single-step breakpoints. (fetch_inferior_event): Install a cleanup that removes infrun breakpoints. (switch_back_to_stepped_thread) <expect thread advanced also>: Clear step-over info. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c (main): Add more instructions. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp (probe_target_hardware_step): New procedure. (top level): Probe hardware stepping and hardware breakpoint support. Test stepping through a read-only region, with both "breakpoint auto-hw" on and off and both "always-inserted" on and off.
2014-10-15 19:18:31 +00:00
# Probe for hardware stepping.
proc probe_target_hardware_step {} {
global gdb_prompt
set hw_step 0
gdb_test_no_output "set debug target 1"
set test "probe target hardware step"
gdb_test_multiple "si" $test {
-re "to_resume \\(\[^\r\n\]+, step, .*$gdb_prompt $" {
set hw_step 1
pass $test
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $test
}
}
gdb_test "set debug target 0" "->to_log_command.*\\).*"
return $hw_step
}
Really fail inserting software breakpoints on read-only regions Currently, with "set breakpoint auto-hw off", we'll still try to insert a software breakpoint at addresses covered by supposedly read-only or inacessible regions: (top-gdb) mem 0x443000 0x450000 ro (top-gdb) set mem inaccessible-by-default off (top-gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000443956 <+34>: movq $0x0,0x10(%rax) => 0x000000000044395e <+42>: movq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 0x0000000000443966 <+50>: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax 0x0000000000443969 <+53>: mov %eax,-0x20(%rbp) End of assembler dump. (top-gdb) b *0x0000000000443969 Breakpoint 5 at 0x443969: file ../../src/gdb/gdb.c, line 29. (top-gdb) c Continuing. warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0x443969 Breakpoint 5, 0x0000000000443969 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd918) at ../../src/gdb/gdb.c:29 29 args.argc = argc; (top-gdb) We warn, saying that the insertion can't be done, but then proceed attempting the insertion anyway, and in case of manually added regions, the insert actually succeeds. This is a regression; GDB used to fail inserting the breakpoint. More below. I stumbled on this as I wrote a test that manually sets up a read-only memory region with the "mem" command, in order to test GDB's behavior with breakpoints set on read-only regions, even when the real memory the breakpoints are set at isn't really read-only. I wanted that in order to add a test that exercises software single-stepping through read-only regions. Note that the memory regions that target_memory_map returns aren't like e.g., what would expect to see in /proc/PID/maps on Linux. Instead, they're the physical memory map from the _debuggers_ perspective. E.g., a read-only region would be real ROM or flash memory, while a read-only+execute mapping in /proc/PID/maps is still read-write to the debugger (otherwise the debugger wouldn't be able to set software breakpoints in the code segment). If one tries to manually write to memory that falls within a memory region that is known to be read-only, with e.g., "p foo = 1", then we hit a check in memory_xfer_partial_1 before the write mananges to make it to the target side. But writing a software/memory breakpoint nowadays goes through target_write_raw_memory, and unlike when writing memory with TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, nothing on the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY path checks whether we're trying to write to a read-only region. At the time "breakpoint auto-hw" was added, we didn't have the TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY vs TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY target object distinction yet, and the code path in memory_xfer_partial that blocks writes to read-only memory was hit for memory breakpoints too. With GDB 6.8 we had: warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0000000000443943 Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Error accessing memory address 0x443943: Input/output error. So I started out by fixing this by adding the memory region validation to TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY too. But later, when testing against GDBserver, I realized that that would only block software/memory breakpoints GDB itself inserts with gdb/mem-break.c. If a target has a to_insert_breakpoint method, the insertion request will still pass through to the target. So I ended up converting the "cannot set breakpoint" warning in breakpoint.c to a real error return, thus blocking the insertion sooner. With that, we'll end up no longer needing the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY changes once software single-step breakpoints are converted to real breakpoints. We need them today as software single-step breakpoints bypass insert_bp_location. But, it'll be best to leave that in as safeguard anyway, for other direct uses of TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver. gdb/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Error out if inserting a software breakpoint at a read-only address. * target.c (memory_xfer_check_region): New function, factored out from ... (memory_xfer_partial_1): ... this. Make the 'reg_len' local a ULONGEST. (target_xfer_partial) <TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY>: Check the access against the memory region attributes. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c: New file. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp: New file.
2014-10-01 22:31:55 +00:00
# Get the bounds of a function, and write them to FUNC_LO (inclusive),
# FUNC_HI (exclusive). Return true on success and false on failure.
proc get_function_bounds {function func_lo func_hi} {
global gdb_prompt
global hex decimal
upvar $func_lo lo
upvar $func_hi hi
set lo ""
set size ""
set test "get lo address of $function"
gdb_test_multiple "disassemble $function" $test {
-re "($hex) .*$hex <\\+($decimal)>:\[^\r\n\]+\r\nEnd of assembler dump\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set lo $expect_out(1,string)
set size $expect_out(2,string)
pass $test
}
}
if { $lo == "" || $size == "" } {
return false
}
# Account for the size of the last instruction.
set test "get hi address of $function"
gdb_test_multiple "x/2i $function+$size" $test {
-re ".*$hex <$function\\+$size>:\[^\r\n\]+\r\n\[ \]+($hex).*\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set hi $expect_out(1,string)
pass $test
}
}
if { $hi == "" } {
return false
}
# Remove unnecessary leading 0's (0x00000ADDR => 0xADDR) so we can
# easily do matches. Disassemble includes leading zeros, while
# x/i doesn't.
regsub -all "0x0\+" $lo "0x" lo
regsub -all "0x0\+" $hi "0x" hi
return true
}
# Get the address where the thread is currently stopped.
proc get_curr_insn {} {
global gdb_prompt
global hex
set pc ""
set test "get current insn"
gdb_test_multiple "p /x \$pc" $test {
-re " = ($hex)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set pc $expect_out(1,string)
pass $test
}
}
return $pc
}
# Get the address of where a single-step should land.
proc get_next_insn {} {
global gdb_prompt
global hex
set next ""
set test "get next insn"
gdb_test_multiple "x/2i \$pc" $test {
-re "$hex .*:\[^\r\n\]+\r\n\[ \]+($hex).*\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
set next $expect_out(1,string)
pass $test
}
}
return $next
}
Put single-step breakpoints on the bp_location chain This patch makes single-step breakpoints "real" breakpoints on the global location list. There are several benefits to this: - It removes the currently limitation that only 2 single-step breakpoints can be inserted. See an example here of a discussion around a case that wants more than 2, possibly unbounded: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00663.html - makes software single-step work on read-only code regions. The logic to convert a software breakpoint to a hardware breakpoint if the memory map says the breakpoint address is in read only memory is in insert_bp_location. Because software single-step breakpoints bypass all that go and straight to target_insert_breakpoint, we can't software single-step over read only memory. This patch removes that limitation, and adds a test that makes sure that works, by forcing a code region to read-only with "mem LOW HIGH ro" and then stepping through that. - Fixes PR breakpoints/9649 This is an assertion failure in insert_single_step_breakpoint in breakpoint.c, because we may leave stale single-step breakpoints behind on error. The tests for stepping through read-only regions exercise the root cause of the bug, which is that we leave single-step breakpoints behind if we fail to insert any single-step breakpoint. Deleting the single-step breakpoints in resume_cleanups, delete_just_stopped_threads_infrun_breakpoints, and fetch_inferior_event fixes this. Without that, we'd no longer hit the assertion, as that code is deleted, but we'd instead run into errors/warnings trying to insert/remove the stale breakpoints on next resume. - Paves the way to have multiple threads software single-stepping at the same time, leaving update_global_location_list to worry about duplicate locations. - Makes the moribund location machinery aware of software single-step breakpoints, paving the way to enable software single-step on non-stop, instead of forcing serialized displaced stepping for all single steps. - It's generaly cleaner. We no longer have to play games with single-step breakpoints inserted at the same address as regular breakpoints, like we recently had to do for 7.8. See this discussion: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00052.html. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, on top of my 'single-step breakpoints on x86' series. gdb/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * breakpoint.c (single_step_breakpoints, single_step_gdbarch): Delete array globals. (single_step_breakpoints): New global. (breakpoint_xfer_memory): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (update_breakpoints_after_exec): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (detach_breakpoints): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (breakpoint_init_inferior): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (bpstat_stop_status): Add comment. (bpstat_what, bptype_string, print_one_breakpoint_location) (adjust_breakpoint_address, init_bp_location): Handle bp_single_step. (new_single_step_breakpoint): New function. (set_momentary_breakpoint, bkpt_remove_location): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (insert_single_step_breakpoint, single_step_breakpoints_inserted) (remove_single_step_breakpoints, cancel_single_step_breakpoints): Rewrite. (detach_single_step_breakpoints, find_single_step_breakpoint): Delete functions. (breakpoint_has_location_inserted_here): New function. (single_step_breakpoint_inserted_here_p): Rewrite. * breakpoint.h: Remove FIXME. (enum bptype) <bp_single_step>: New enum value. (insert_single_step_breakpoint): Update comment. * infrun.c (resume_cleanups) (delete_step_thread_step_resume_breakpoint): Remove single-step breakpoints. (fetch_inferior_event): Install a cleanup that removes infrun breakpoints. (switch_back_to_stepped_thread) <expect thread advanced also>: Clear step-over info. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c (main): Add more instructions. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp (probe_target_hardware_step): New procedure. (top level): Probe hardware stepping and hardware breakpoint support. Test stepping through a read-only region, with both "breakpoint auto-hw" on and off and both "always-inserted" on and off.
2014-10-15 19:18:31 +00:00
set hw_step [probe_target_hardware_step]
Really fail inserting software breakpoints on read-only regions Currently, with "set breakpoint auto-hw off", we'll still try to insert a software breakpoint at addresses covered by supposedly read-only or inacessible regions: (top-gdb) mem 0x443000 0x450000 ro (top-gdb) set mem inaccessible-by-default off (top-gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000443956 <+34>: movq $0x0,0x10(%rax) => 0x000000000044395e <+42>: movq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 0x0000000000443966 <+50>: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax 0x0000000000443969 <+53>: mov %eax,-0x20(%rbp) End of assembler dump. (top-gdb) b *0x0000000000443969 Breakpoint 5 at 0x443969: file ../../src/gdb/gdb.c, line 29. (top-gdb) c Continuing. warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0x443969 Breakpoint 5, 0x0000000000443969 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd918) at ../../src/gdb/gdb.c:29 29 args.argc = argc; (top-gdb) We warn, saying that the insertion can't be done, but then proceed attempting the insertion anyway, and in case of manually added regions, the insert actually succeeds. This is a regression; GDB used to fail inserting the breakpoint. More below. I stumbled on this as I wrote a test that manually sets up a read-only memory region with the "mem" command, in order to test GDB's behavior with breakpoints set on read-only regions, even when the real memory the breakpoints are set at isn't really read-only. I wanted that in order to add a test that exercises software single-stepping through read-only regions. Note that the memory regions that target_memory_map returns aren't like e.g., what would expect to see in /proc/PID/maps on Linux. Instead, they're the physical memory map from the _debuggers_ perspective. E.g., a read-only region would be real ROM or flash memory, while a read-only+execute mapping in /proc/PID/maps is still read-write to the debugger (otherwise the debugger wouldn't be able to set software breakpoints in the code segment). If one tries to manually write to memory that falls within a memory region that is known to be read-only, with e.g., "p foo = 1", then we hit a check in memory_xfer_partial_1 before the write mananges to make it to the target side. But writing a software/memory breakpoint nowadays goes through target_write_raw_memory, and unlike when writing memory with TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, nothing on the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY path checks whether we're trying to write to a read-only region. At the time "breakpoint auto-hw" was added, we didn't have the TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY vs TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY target object distinction yet, and the code path in memory_xfer_partial that blocks writes to read-only memory was hit for memory breakpoints too. With GDB 6.8 we had: warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0000000000443943 Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Error accessing memory address 0x443943: Input/output error. So I started out by fixing this by adding the memory region validation to TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY too. But later, when testing against GDBserver, I realized that that would only block software/memory breakpoints GDB itself inserts with gdb/mem-break.c. If a target has a to_insert_breakpoint method, the insertion request will still pass through to the target. So I ended up converting the "cannot set breakpoint" warning in breakpoint.c to a real error return, thus blocking the insertion sooner. With that, we'll end up no longer needing the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY changes once software single-step breakpoints are converted to real breakpoints. We need them today as software single-step breakpoints bypass insert_bp_location. But, it'll be best to leave that in as safeguard anyway, for other direct uses of TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver. gdb/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Error out if inserting a software breakpoint at a read-only address. * target.c (memory_xfer_check_region): New function, factored out from ... (memory_xfer_partial_1): ... this. Make the 'reg_len' local a ULONGEST. (target_xfer_partial) <TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY>: Check the access against the memory region attributes. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c: New file. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp: New file.
2014-10-01 22:31:55 +00:00
if ![get_function_bounds "main" main_lo main_hi] {
# Can't do the following tests if main's bounds are unknown.
return -1
}
# Manually create a read-only memory region that covers 'main'.
gdb_test_no_output "mem $main_lo $main_hi ro" \
"create read-only mem region covering main"
# So that we don't fail inserting breakpoints on addresses outside
# main, like the internal event breakpoints.
gdb_test_no_output "set mem inaccessible-by-default off"
# So we get an immediate warning/error without needing to resume the
# target.
gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint always-inserted on"
# Disable the automatic fallback to HW breakpoints. We want a
# software breakpoint to be attempted, and to fail.
gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint auto-hw off"
# Confirm manual writes to the read-only memory region fail.
gdb_test "p /x *(char *) $main_lo = 1" \
"Cannot access memory at address $main_lo" \
"writing to read-only memory fails"
# Ensure that inserting a software breakpoint in a known-read-only
# region fails.
gdb_test "break *$main_lo" \
"Cannot insert breakpoint .*Cannot set software breakpoint at read-only address $main_lo.*" \
"inserting software breakpoint in read-only memory fails"
Put single-step breakpoints on the bp_location chain This patch makes single-step breakpoints "real" breakpoints on the global location list. There are several benefits to this: - It removes the currently limitation that only 2 single-step breakpoints can be inserted. See an example here of a discussion around a case that wants more than 2, possibly unbounded: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00663.html - makes software single-step work on read-only code regions. The logic to convert a software breakpoint to a hardware breakpoint if the memory map says the breakpoint address is in read only memory is in insert_bp_location. Because software single-step breakpoints bypass all that go and straight to target_insert_breakpoint, we can't software single-step over read only memory. This patch removes that limitation, and adds a test that makes sure that works, by forcing a code region to read-only with "mem LOW HIGH ro" and then stepping through that. - Fixes PR breakpoints/9649 This is an assertion failure in insert_single_step_breakpoint in breakpoint.c, because we may leave stale single-step breakpoints behind on error. The tests for stepping through read-only regions exercise the root cause of the bug, which is that we leave single-step breakpoints behind if we fail to insert any single-step breakpoint. Deleting the single-step breakpoints in resume_cleanups, delete_just_stopped_threads_infrun_breakpoints, and fetch_inferior_event fixes this. Without that, we'd no longer hit the assertion, as that code is deleted, but we'd instead run into errors/warnings trying to insert/remove the stale breakpoints on next resume. - Paves the way to have multiple threads software single-stepping at the same time, leaving update_global_location_list to worry about duplicate locations. - Makes the moribund location machinery aware of software single-step breakpoints, paving the way to enable software single-step on non-stop, instead of forcing serialized displaced stepping for all single steps. - It's generaly cleaner. We no longer have to play games with single-step breakpoints inserted at the same address as regular breakpoints, like we recently had to do for 7.8. See this discussion: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00052.html. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, on top of my 'single-step breakpoints on x86' series. gdb/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * breakpoint.c (single_step_breakpoints, single_step_gdbarch): Delete array globals. (single_step_breakpoints): New global. (breakpoint_xfer_memory): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (update_breakpoints_after_exec): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (detach_breakpoints): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (breakpoint_init_inferior): Delete bp_single_step breakpoints. (bpstat_stop_status): Add comment. (bpstat_what, bptype_string, print_one_breakpoint_location) (adjust_breakpoint_address, init_bp_location): Handle bp_single_step. (new_single_step_breakpoint): New function. (set_momentary_breakpoint, bkpt_remove_location): Remove special handling for single-step breakpoints. (insert_single_step_breakpoint, single_step_breakpoints_inserted) (remove_single_step_breakpoints, cancel_single_step_breakpoints): Rewrite. (detach_single_step_breakpoints, find_single_step_breakpoint): Delete functions. (breakpoint_has_location_inserted_here): New function. (single_step_breakpoint_inserted_here_p): Rewrite. * breakpoint.h: Remove FIXME. (enum bptype) <bp_single_step>: New enum value. (insert_single_step_breakpoint): Update comment. * infrun.c (resume_cleanups) (delete_step_thread_step_resume_breakpoint): Remove single-step breakpoints. (fetch_inferior_event): Install a cleanup that removes infrun breakpoints. (switch_back_to_stepped_thread) <expect thread advanced also>: Clear step-over info. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR breakpoints/9649 * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c (main): Add more instructions. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp (probe_target_hardware_step): New procedure. (top level): Probe hardware stepping and hardware breakpoint support. Test stepping through a read-only region, with both "breakpoint auto-hw" on and off and both "always-inserted" on and off.
2014-10-15 19:18:31 +00:00
delete_breakpoints
set supports_hbreak 0
set test "probe hbreak support"
gdb_test_multiple "hbreak *$main_lo" $test {
-re "You may have requested too many.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "$test (no support)"
}
-re "No hardware breakpoint support.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "$test (no support)"
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "$test (support)"
set supports_hbreak 1
}
}
delete_breakpoints
# Check that the "auto-hw on/off" setting affects single-step
# breakpoints as expected, by stepping through the read-only region.
# If the target does hardware stepping, we won't exercise that aspect,
# but we should be able to step through the region without seeing the
# hardware breakpoint or read-only address errors.
proc test_single_step { always_inserted auto_hw } {
global gdb_prompt
global decimal
global supports_hbreak
global hw_step
gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint always-inserted $always_inserted"
gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint auto-hw $auto_hw"
# Get the address of the current instruction so we know where SI is
# starting from.
set curr_insn [get_curr_insn]
# Get the address of the next instruction so we know where SI should
# land.
set next_insn [get_next_insn]
set test "step in ro region"
gdb_test_multiple "si" $test {
-re "Could not insert hardware breakpoints.*$gdb_prompt $" {
gdb_assert {!$hw_step && $auto_hw == "on" && !$supports_hbreak} \
"$test (cannot insert hw break)"
}
-re "Cannot set software breakpoint at read-only address $next_insn.*$gdb_prompt $" {
gdb_assert {!$hw_step && $auto_hw == "off"} \
"$test (cannot insert sw break)"
}
-re "^si\r\nNote: automatically using hardware breakpoints for read-only addresses\.\r\n${decimal}\[ \t\]+i = 0;\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
gdb_assert {!$hw_step && $auto_hw == "on" && $supports_hbreak} \
"$test (auto-hw)"
}
-re "^si\r\n${decimal}\[ \t\]+i = 0;\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
gdb_assert {$hw_step || ($auto_hw == "on" && $supports_hbreak)} \
"$test (no error)"
}
}
gdb_test "maint info breakpoints 0" \
"No breakpoint or watchpoint matching '0'\." \
"single-step breakpoint is not left behind"
# Confirm the thread really advanced.
if {$hw_step || ($auto_hw == "on" && $supports_hbreak)} {
gdb_test "p /x \$pc" " = $next_insn" "thread advanced"
} else {
gdb_test "p /x \$pc" " = $curr_insn" "thread did not advance"
}
}
foreach always_inserted {"off" "on"} {
foreach auto_hw {"off" "on"} {
with_test_prefix "always-inserted $always_inserted: auto-hw $auto_hw" {
test_single_step $always_inserted $auto_hw
}
}
}